User talk:Bobo192

Welcome to my talk page. I tend to quote your messages back any time you send me, in the format as below. I will always respond to any queries you leave here on your own talk page.

On User talk:Bobo192, ABC said:
message

Talk page navigation

Archive I · (October 23, 2005 — February 2, 2006)
Archive II · (February 2, 2006 — November 10, 2006)
Archive III · (November 10, 2006 — February 19, 2007)
Archive IV · (February 19, 2007 — June 18, 2007)
Archive V · (June 18, 2007 — October 11, 2007)
Archive VI · (October 11, 2007 — January 7, 2008)
Archive VII · (January 8, 2008 - July 16, 2008)
Archive VIII · (July 16, 2008 - November 6, 2008)
Archive IX · (November 7, 2008 - October 2, 2009)
Current talk page | Purge

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Change name of Missing Gujarat, India cricketer from Anjum Botawala to Aiyub Botawala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaels (talk • contribs) 10:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The International Festival of Very Shorts

Any idea what could link INTO this page?

The International Festival of Very Shorts

Thanks IceDragon64 (talk) 19:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First-class cricket redlinks

Hi, thanks for the message. As not much is going on in the world of the Associates or Affiliates I thought I'd have a go at the your list that I came across. I was wondering if you'd be able to edit the Hampshire section to remove the blue links so only the red links are left. Thanks.AssociateAffiliate (talk) 23:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another (deserved) barnstar...!

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For constantly surprising me when I search for an incredibly obscure cricketer, only to find you've already created an article for them... Keep it up, it's much appreciated! — AMBerry (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...and that obscure cricketer on this occasion would be Selby Norton, which I've expanded a little bit! — AMBerry (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Durham redlinks

No problem! I had a look through the Durham CricketArchive players list and could find none missing. When there are new First-class/List-A players I'll try and create them when the new season starts. Now back to Hampshire players and waiting until anything of note in the world of the Affiliates and Associates happens. Now for the ICC to grant mighty Ireland Test status!AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire CB

That does them, I added the already created players to the HCB list, then put the "No names to add" tag to replace the players. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 23:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire redlinks

I'll get back onto those as soon as CricketArchive is back up, it has been down for the last two days. Besides, being snowed in in rural Hampshire means I have nothing else to do! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 09:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation you added to Lead paint does not say anything about lead causing hearing loss

Hi Bobo192. Thanks for all your edits to Wikipedia. But the citation you added to Lead paint in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lead_paint&diff=prev&oldid=224431273 does not say anything about lead causing hearing loss. Could you please fix this? One easy way to fix it would be to remove the words "hearing loss" from the article. This seems like a fine plan. I don't know if lead causes hearing loss or not, but it would be fine to leave it out and only list the other awful problems that the CDC says that lead causes. Thanks in advance, --unforgettableid | talk 18:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done - no worries. Apologies for my late reply, I've been so swamped in other things lately, that I have had no time to access Wikipedia. All the best. Bobo . 21:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you fixed it now. Thank you. --unforgettableid | talk 20:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire redlinks

I'll try and get most of those actioned in the next week. I'm just out of hospital after an ankle operation so I'm pretty immobile which means I'll have plenty of time on my hands! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Nice to hear back from you Bobo! Those Hampshire redlinks are getting fewer and fewer each day, once I've done those I'll have a go at the Dorset ones. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, been quite some effort! Takes my mind off of the problems in my life at the moment, so I'm happy doing it. Just going through the pre-county club scorecards and creating/tagging players. Added about 50 names to the Hampshire cricketers category this way. Might make 800+ names in the category! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

[1]. - Kittybrewster ☎ 11:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire redlinks

Final push, now under 25 redlinks to do, plus give or take 10-20 pre-county club players. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire redlinks done! Just comparing the Hampshire CricketArchive and adding any that have been missed out, then I'll finish the pre-county club players. Should make 850 cricketers, roughly. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dorset redlinks

I'll get those finished in the next week or so, then have a crack at a few Berkshire cricketers. Regards, AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Event people

Hi, I proposed KR Desai, JE King, D. Gamit, SK Desai, J. Desai, P. Balsara, Y. Angalia, Essof Ashroff, Chandulal Banker, Deepak Banker, Ziauddin (cricketer), Taufiq Ahmed, Mohammad Hanif (cricketer), Talat Ahmed, Ijaz Saeed, Mohammad Ansari, Anjub Botawala, Mukesh Desai, Bharat Desai (cricketer), Nilesh Chaudhary, Subhash Bhatt, Prem Bhatia, Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer), Rashid Saleem, Geoff Evans (cricketer), Fakir Dungryia, Chiranjit Dhir, Christopher Edwards (cricketer), Dipak Patel (cricketer, born 1961) for deletion because there is no significant coverage for them and their claim to notability is always only one event. Regards Hekerui (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dorset cricketers

All done! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A request for help (which I think is easy)

I'm trying to clear out the backlog of Category:Requests to move a userspace draft. A request arrived today here. I can figure out what to do in many situations, but I stay away from bands, video games and footballers, as the guidelines for notability are well-established, but I'm not conversant with them. I'll be happy to take care of the move and the follow up, but I;m not in a position to know whether Maxamed Maalimey meets the Notability threshold. I see that you are busy, if you cannot look at this, I'll try another member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Members, unless you want to suggest one.--SPhilbrick T 19:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt response. I plan to inform the editor, and suggest the editor check in at the wikiproject. I'll leave you a courtesy copy, but nothing more needed from you at this time.--SPhilbrick T 19:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link to editor response, again, this is a courtesy note, no need for action.--SPhilbrick T 19:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Returning your call

Hi Bobo - good to hear from you. As I go through the seasons I am checking the players and so far have not come across any more missing - apart from one redlink in a recent season which now seems to have been filled. As for Atif, we will see what happens. Regards Motmit (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just picked up this missing player.Andrew Watts Regards Motmit (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redlink idea

Go for it! Sounds like a great way to keep track of what has been done, particularly for those John Smiths out there! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, will make doing the redlinks a hell of a lot easier! I've been going through and amending some redlinks and bluelinks which lead to the wrong people. Wonder how many English first-class and List-A players are left to do? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PROD

No worries, just going by WP:CRIC! Cracking on with Berkshire cricketers, nearly done them. Another week and the List-A ones will be done, then just a case of looking through the archives to find notable players who have represented them in MC cricket. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lets hope in 50 years or so that cricket has grown to such an extent they can be seen as notable. Although given the ICC's regression in terms of the Associates, I somewhat doubt that :( AssociateAffiliate (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Slovenian cricketer

All is good here, hopefully the same with yourself. How many English first-class cricketer you think we've got to get done in total? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow.... would never have guessed it was that many. Has to be at least 1500 on the second, the Minor Counties and Cricket Boards have to make nearly a 1000. Not to mention MCC and University cricketers and players who represented XI's and other first-class teams. 6000 at least! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Berkshire redlinks

All done! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiltshire! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiltshire cricketers

All done! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:prod

No worries. I suspect that notability criteria may be different on the German wikipedia for pre-Bundesliga footballers. Of course I have no problem keeping the articles if there was more verifiable information that these players are notable.

I went ahead and created an AfD. It's here if there's anything you want to discuss about the deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Women's List A cricketers

Sounds cool. That would be great, get working on them once I have Cambridgeshire done - I'll pass it onto Harrias as well who seems to be cracking on with some women's articles! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 09:45, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No rush lol. Will take me an age to get most of the Minor counties cricketers done. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 12:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bobo192/First-class players lists 001-010

This is wonderful stuff. I've just knocked up a quick stub for Ian Hutchinson (cricketer), a player I much admired. A suggestion - a short bit of text at the top of each of your list pages explaining the way it's laid out, would be helpful. For example, I think you've put them in reverse chronological order of first appearance... but I'm guessing. --Dweller (talk) 11:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up Bobo. Will AfD that article, even AfDing the non first-class cricketers I created!!! With the players I have completed from your lists, I'm now organising them to lists like List of Dorset CCC players. Just got to work out a way to do the first-class teams. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Cricket for an article for The Signpost. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Thanks and I take this opportunity to wish you a very Happy New Year! – SMasters (talk) 07:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Cheers

Yep, we're hitting the nail on the head with those ones now. We finally reached a consensus on WT:CRIC about what denotes a cricketer as notable. Those who have appeared in WCL Div 5 and above are now notable, those below or who haven't appeared in the WCL are not. Youth ODI and Test cricketers remain non-notable. Hopefully that will put paid to all the months of confusion within the project! Now we're putting in/replacing infoboxes on articles and removing those who don't meet notability as we go. Regards, AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All your lists got a mention!!! Hopefully 5 years down the line most of the names will be blue.... just maybe! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buckinghamshire redlinks

That's all the Buckinghamshire redlinks done (well the last Ronald Hooker has been started if not done!), just a few more to go on most others on that page. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. I think I've got all the Minor Counties to have at least 100 players listed under their category (apart from Wales MC and Herefordshire). Think there's also under 150 Minor counties players to go. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More Barnstars!!!

		The Excellent User Page Award
		Congrats!!! Bobherry (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

That's in recent weeks all the Staffordshire, Wales MC and Suffolk redlinks completed. Possibly under 100 Minor counties cricketers left to do, will have a count. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How many English cricketers in total does that leave to do? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's Northumberland done. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oxfordshire done. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All Herefordshire cricketers done. That includes everyone who has played for the county since 1992 and is deemed notable. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All notable Bucks cricketers done - 244 in total. Dorset next! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retiring

I don't think I have the motivation nowdays to create/update articles anymore. That's not to say I won't come back in the future, but I wish you well and hope to see some more of those many obscure cricketers getting articles in the future! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, not at all Bobo. It's for personal reasons. I might get the motivation back next week or next year! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I can find ways to motivate myself, I'll give it another go! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 12:53, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To do

Any significant reduction in the number of English cricketers to do? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bobo. Nearly 400 in 3 months, not too bad. Should be all done in just under 2 years at that rate, although I'm leaving the 100 matches, 400 wickets, 10,000 runs ones to last, so they'll take longer to do. The Minor counties List A cricketers are down to 42 to go, with a handful being of the loads of wickets and runs description. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The project has them all covered. Shame most of the single match players have been done, I used to love those. Nice and quick to create! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cull

Hey Bobo. Culling some Namibian cricketers that fail WP:CRIN. Sorry!!! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleared

I've done the third page of English counties. Also, could you lend a vote to this? Thanks Bobo. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update

That's Cambridgeshire done. Would you be able to tell me if the other pages have dramatically decreased since the last count? Hope all is well. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bobo. So give or take an error margin of say 5, that's roughly 2,850 to do. Might be done by 2015! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 20:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had that exact same thought when doing Hugh Smith, though his only appearance was a little more successful than the Kent chaps! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All done/started

I've created stub articles for the last of the minor counties cricketers, so that's them all done. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Harrison

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adam Harrison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Baseball Watcher 22:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I don't know why I haven't given you a barnstar thus far! So here is one for making the brilliant redlinked players lists, which without such a resource it would take far longer to create player articles. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking to get 8,000 names in the English cricketers categories, mostly been getting there via Sussex. Think it's under 50 to go till that landmark. The lists are more than useful, when all the players are done they'll serve as archive to show how many we created! The end of the year has been fruitful, I'll be back in work with the NHS in early January, so the amount I'll create will slow, but I'll still create them! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update

I've got the Category:English cricketers to contain 8000 names, so that's one target I set myself to get done before the end of the year which has been reached! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was Albert Brown. It's 8001 now as Simon Kerrigan was missing the category! AssociateAffiliate (talk) 17:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the numbers

You'll have to pass on your tip of how you count how many names are left to do! On the subject, has there been much of a change since the beginning of December? AssociateAffiliate (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Input request

You have contributed to article The Really Big Show (formerly Rizzo on the Radio). This article is currently being considered for deletion. Please consider providing input at the article's discussion page: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Really_Big_Show. Levdr1lp (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Bobo192,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 13:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Redgate

I was on the cricket forum page and followed the to-do link to User:Bobo192/First-class players lists 011-020. I think I can save you one in the Notts section because I'm sure your "redlink" to Samuel Redgate would duplicate Sam Redgate. He was a famous bowler. Hope this helps. --86.174.153.67 (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'd be interested in helping out if I can. What are the "many other benefits" of creating an account rather than using the IP address and can anyone join the cricket project? Thanks. --86.174.153.67 (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information, Bobo. I'll look around to see what interests me and where I could contribute. I'll let you know if I register a name. --86.174.153.67 (talk) 13:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Bobo. As you can see, I've registered. I'll join the cricket and football projects and have a good look around. I will try to help with some of the missing players although it looks as if you already have a full set of Yorkshire players who would be my strongest suit. Thanks again for your help. --Brian 21:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianDeeG (talk • contribs)

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing Bobo192 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 00:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zafarullah Jan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zafarullah Jan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per the template that you removed. If you are the page creator you are not supposed to remove that tag. If you disagree with my nomination, you are supposed to contest it on the talk page. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zafarullah Jan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zafarullah Jan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafarullah Jan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yanks and cricket haha! Hope all is well with you Bobo. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Unfortunately my copy of excel has gone all glitchy on me. So, would you be able to do the numbers on the English first-class cricketers? Thanks. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, few hundred more knocked off. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Will Rudge'

Hi. The article 'Will Rudge' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.ecb.co.uk/stats/players/gloucestershire/will-rudge,459,PP.html

You added this in December 2005.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 03:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Hey Bobo, hope all is well. I haven't gotten around to replacing my glitchy excel, so any chance of an update on the numbers? Thanks. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Getting there! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Hey Bobo, hope all is well. Any chance of an update on the numbers? Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 15:50, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Getting there slowly but surely. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New tactic

As I would here for the next decade writing detailed entries for some of the cricketers which are left, if they have had long career (60+ matches), then I'm just going to create the article with name, dob, batting/bowling styles and an infobox (like at Paul Todd (cricketer)), that way I can knock them off more quickly, then come back to them later. Glamorgan first! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 11:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Watkins (writer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryan Watkins (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1 02:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Umananda Bora

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Umananda Bora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bishnu Saikia (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Allen (cricketer)

Hi Bobo. Hope you're well. Just a quick note to say I've put a PROD on this one because it seems to duplicate Sandy Allen (cricketer), and in the various parallel improvements since the two articles were started, the other one seems to have acquired a bit more info than this one. Johnlp (talk) 11:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Seems to have been done like that anyway, which is sensible. Thanks. Johnlp (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Well I retired and now I'm back! Any chance of the numbers??? Hope all is well with you. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Slow getting close to <2000 to go! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits from Anons on one of your user pages.

I was on the recent edits pages and noticed IP addresses editing your page I wanted to bring this to your attention just incase. HereFord 22:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Timothy Lester

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Timothy Lester requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Biker Biker (talk) 09:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Davies (cricketer, born 1959) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Davies (cricketer, born 1959) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Davies (cricketer, born 1959) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bobo192. You have new messages at BlackJack's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New list format

Hi Bobo. Your new format seems fine to me and the collapsibles seem to work as intended. I've changed the links in my chronological list in the CRIC to-do section and mentioned there that is a clear crossover between your lists and mine re the players active to 1850 (especially Sussex, Kent and Surrey). Good work. We'll get there someday. ----Jack | ^{talk page} 12:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alex Wyatt

The article Alex Wyatt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Redlinks

Thanks! Happy to help with filling them in. Noticed you have a couple of lists in your userspace - don't know if there's any over-lap between them. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request to take part in a survey

Hi there. I would very much appreciate it if you could spend ~2 minutes and take a short survey - a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. I sent you an email with details, if you did not get it please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. I would very much appreciate your cooperation, as you are among the most active Wikipedia editors who show a pattern of reduced activity, and thus your response would be extremely valuable. Thanks! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobo192. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Cricket lists

Hi Bobo. I've linked all the cricket lists of English FC teams together with a template (see the footer on List of Essex CCC players, for example). Please feel free to expand this template to include other lists. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about the Derbyshire list - I just added the template to it! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:05, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. From all your redlink lists, do you have any FC cricketers who were 100 yrs old or older, who don't yet have Wiki articles? People with def. birth and death dates to back this up? No worries if you don't have this info to hand. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Hey Bobo, hope all is well. Nice 5-0 Ashes whitewash on the cards at least! Wouldn't be able to give an update on the English redlinks would you? Thanks. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No rush!!! :) Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 20:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amit Bhandari

The article Amit Bhandari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not have any reference

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Babita arora 09:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

William Riley (x2)

Hey Bobo. Thanks for your note. Created article for second William Riley. Ensures disambiguation. The Notts man died in FWW action in 1917. Best. --Bill (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Faiz Aftab

The article Faiz Aftab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Orphan. No reliable sources. Tagged for notability for almost 2 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~KvnG 23:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anurag Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anurag Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Rovine - Wanna talk? - ^{What do I think?} 08:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C. Lodtag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. Lodtag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Lodtag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Returning thanks

I think it's a nice little feature... though I use it pretty sparingly. Anyway I liked your comment on the WT:CRIC page: some people don't seem to consider that there might be good reasons why we do what we do (like keeping it simple!). Johnlp (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should add your mischievous thought to the "discussion" at the foot of the WT:CRIC page currently... how about a List of Test cricketers who have taken no wickets on debut? ;) Johnlp (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Riaz Afridi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Riaz Afridi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444^Talk 11:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riaz Afridi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riaz Afridi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riaz Afridi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 13:47, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

Hello :) How did you become an administrator in 554 days? Tell me about your journey please :) so I can perhaps learn a few things. Pixarh (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Azhar Ali (Omani cricketer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Azhar Ali (Omani cricketer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 15:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lakshitha Wikramage

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lakshitha Wikramage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redrose64 (talk) 19:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P. Balsara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Balsara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Balsara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Perera (Old Cambrians cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Perera (Old Cambrians cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Old Cambrians cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 03:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manzoor (Delhi cricketer)

The article Manzoor (Delhi cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost identical situation to that of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer), where the consensus was to delete - a solitary first class appearance, but no biographical details whatsoever; not even a first name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SageGreenRider (talk) 01:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Farook (Saurashtra cricketer)

The article Farook (Saurashtra cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost identical situation to that of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer), where the consensus was to delete - a solitary first class appearance, but no biographical details whatsoever; not even a first name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SageGreenRider (talk) 01:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer)

The article Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost identical situation to that of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer), where the consensus was to delete - a solitary first class appearance, but no biographical details whatsoever; not even a first name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SageGreenRider (talk) 01:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Narain (Madhya Pradesh cricketer)

The article Narain (Madhya Pradesh cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost identical situation to that of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer), where the consensus was to delete - only twi first class appearance, but no biographical details whatsoever; not even a first name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SageGreenRider (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manzoor (Delhi cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manzoor (Delhi cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manzoor (Delhi cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farook (Saurashtra cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farook (Saurashtra cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farook (Saurashtra cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Narain (Madhya Pradesh cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Narain (Madhya Pradesh cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narain (Madhya Pradesh cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perera

Hello Bobo. Hope you are okay. Please see [2] for a surprise. :-) Jack | ^{talk page} 17:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-establishing parity at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S._Perera_(Old_Cambrians_cricketer)_(2nd_nomination)

When counting the !votes in this discussion page, I have found that two !votes were asserted twice, leading to the conclusion We even have the same number of double !votes for both opinions. Obviously, good faith is not in question, the organization of the discussion was rather confuse. In between, User:Jreferee has reorganized his comments. Perhaps, could you do the same? Thanks in advance. Pldx1 (talk) 14:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leslie Aaron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie Aaron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Aaron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jim Carter 16:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leslie Aaron

The article Leslie Aaron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is ineligible for BLP PROD, however it lacks any referencing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tseung Kwan O (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Bobo192. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Bobo192.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bobo192. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bobo192. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sattar Bhagat

The article Sattar Bhagat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NATHLETE: BEFORE did not produce demonstrably independent and reliable sources offering significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 15:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sattar Bhagat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sattar Bhagat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sattar Bhagat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —swpb^T 14:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Kent

Hello, Bobo. There are now less than 70 Kent players so with a big push we can shift these very soon. I think there are about 300 in total of Middx, Notts & Surrey so, as far as current county clubs go, there could be light at the end of the tunnel (unless it's the proverbial train, of course). All the best. Jack | ^{talk page} 09:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prod: Dinaparna

Proposed deletion of L. Dinaparna

The article L. Dinaparna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability
References
Orphan
It looks like this article is simply a copy from another database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Cranston

The article Tom Cranston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Passes WP:NCRIC but not the WP:GNG - couldn't find any in-depth sources about him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Cranston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Cranston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Cranston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hack (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Harrias ^talk 18:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Beckett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Beckett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Beckett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kagundu Talk To Me 08:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hope to see you on here again soon

Best wishes, Bobo. I fully understand your frustration. Jack | ^{talk page} 16:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Mason (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Mason (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Mason (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A. Amaranath for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Amaranath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Amaranath until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 20:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in this

Hello, Bobo. Hope you are okay. I've opened this case at WP:GNG. All the best. Jack | ^{talk page} 08:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Bobo

As you're here, you might like to look at the NSPORTS talk page where Mr FAQ First doesn't like me correcting the FAQ. Jack | ^{talk page} 06:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All the best.....

.....to you, too, Bobo. I absolutely agree with you. This site is frankly falling apart at the seams with negative cliques and FAQ apologists who are WP:NOTHERE for anything but some ludicrous, illogical agenda of their own making. I've no problem with WP:CRIC as a whole apart from one utterly stupid individual who is a complete waste of space and hasn't a clue what he's on about. Anyway, I'm walking away from it for now and I'll be back sometime later this year, perhaps next month. I've decided to pursue some of my other interests in the meantime and, as one of them is outside, I hope current forecasts of an Indian Summer are accurate. All the best, mate. Jack | ^{talk page} 12:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dinesh de Zoysa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinesh de Zoysa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh de Zoysa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Dhanayake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Dhanayake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Dhanayake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 23:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I. Kudigame for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I. Kudigame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. Kudigame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 20:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dinamina

Hello, Bobo. Take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh de Zoysa‎, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. Kudigame‎, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Dhanayake and at their articles, including the footnotes appended. I believe we now have a strong case with two additional pieces of evidence. One is that cricket coverage by Dinamina is expansive per our contact's findings re Perera and so these articles must be protected by WP:NEXIST. Secondly, you will note that I have added the ACS 2005 booklet on Sri Lankan players up to that time as an extra source, so there are now THREE reliable sources for all players up to the 2004–05 SL season.

Nomination of Wenura Caldera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wenura Caldera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wenura Caldera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sujith Fernando for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sujith Fernando is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujith Fernando until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janitha Hewawasam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janitha Hewawasam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janitha Hewawasam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 16:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bobo. The AfD is a misrepresentation of guidelines designed to mislead and I think action should be taken against this individual. I've issued a warning. Jack | ^{talk page} 21:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C. Thusara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. Thusara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Thusara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 17:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. Kodikara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. Kodikara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Kodikara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 14:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This time I am having a rest

My last rest soon ended, Bobo, but from this weekend I will certainly have a complete rest from this site because we're away to warmer climes and I never use computers when that happens. We will in fact be gone for over seven weeks (down under but not with England) and I suppose I'll come back on here in February and see how much deeper it's all sunk. Anyway, all the best to you, mate. Bye for now. Jack | ^{talk page} 10:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobo. I'm still on holiday but I got a text from a mutual friend saying you have quit. I fully understand and I reckon you are right, especially now they're going to delete CA. It's ludicrous. Tried to mail you but your address is broken. All the best. Jack | ^{talk page} 11:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bobo192. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1970)

The article Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1970) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No indication of notability at all. The single first class appearance is only a BLP1E, and they never played at that level again. Routine sports statistics reporting only. Not possible to write anything even slightly more in-depth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobo192. I see you you were very quick to dePROD the above. Sorry, but your edit summary was not that helpful. What do you mean by "I thought we were over all this" ? Also, if the article is of any value, may I ask you to link to it from another article. Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive me, my edit summary was inappropriately blunt. There has been a lot of this deleting articles which meet WP:CRIN lately and it makes me sad. I have been participating to Wikipedia for 13 years now and the fact that we are deciding that some cricketers which do pass CRIN are now apparently inappropriate for the project is making me sad. Bobo . 12:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While I still think this subject is totally not notable, I am not here to debate the matter and will agree to disagree. May I ask you, however, to link to this article somehow. If the subject is notable, even if only in the world of cricket, then surely something can link to it, especially to a player, their team, list of players ? Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:CRIN, the article is notable. What we do need to do, probably, is write better, and more thorough, lists of individual cricketers by team - those which have been recently deleted have been based on random names which have been plucked out of midair. Articles such as List of Andhra cricketers do not help the project at all and probably need to be extended to include every major cricketer for the team. Bobo . 12:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Andhra cricketers was not exactly random. It was the up until then the relevant orphaned articles. It is much better to have an article linked in and hence more visible than languishing as an orphan and essentially invisible and ignored and forgotten. I have added a lot more to the list just now. If you can get to me, or tell me where I can easily find, relevant player match debut and active period data for all the players, in a structured format, I can probably add that very quickly too for you. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If I can help with any lists, please let me know on my talk page. Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of B. W. Wijetunge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B. W. Wijetunge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. W. Wijetunge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. de Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. de Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. de Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 14:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of B. Maitra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B. Maitra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. Maitra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 13:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD bundle

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles C. Sandanayake, C. Fernando, G. Fernando, G. Jayantha, S. Gunatillake, S. Manuratne and D. Perera are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Sandanayake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the articles. Dee 03 15:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Sandanayake

Hi. You are, I think, the original author of all the articles listed in this case. All fail verification. I believe you will have a stronger case to keep the articles if you provide necessary sourcing. Without this, there is risk of original research. I do not believe notability is a valid reason to delete any article. It is subjective. These are just my opinions. I have not yet cast a vote at the forum. Waj (talk) 10:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for whatever you had contributed in past 13 year. I don't know whether you have motivation to continue or not (or want to WP:RETIRE) but remember whatever you had done was very useful to our own project WP:CRIC. Your contributions will be remembered for longer period of time. Again, thanks. Störm (talk) 18:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CE Holkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CE Holkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CE Holkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	You deserve a barnstar for your amazing contributions to WikiProject Cricket though your articles have been deleted and nominated for AfD by non-members of the project. I think you will come back strongly with a resilient performance. Thank you. Abishe (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colin Hemsley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colin Hemsley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Hemsley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Waj (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Colin_Hemsley

Hi. This discussion may be of interest to you. Regards, Waj (talk) 07:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrian Wykes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Wykes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Wykes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocumentError (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:J. Desai

Hello, Bobo192. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "J. Desai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 12:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KUK Herath

The article KUK Herath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:CRIN (he was a player for a youth club, and thus not the "highest level" the standard requires. Doesn't meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A Train^talk 17:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may have already seen but I reverted myself on this one. I failed to notice the earlier group AfD from 2017 before nominating. The article therefore doesn't qualify for PROD and given the recent AfD I'm not inclined to take it back there. Sorry for the fire drill. A Train^talk 18:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Archive

Do you still have access to the Cricket Archive? I've written an article for Phipps Bridge and I've spotted via WhatLinksHere that John Pratt (cricketer) died there, but I don't want to add a cite to an article I don't have access to - not least the fact that the estate was built in the 20th century and Pratt died much earlier than that.--Laun chba ller 23:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing

“and were the first all female group to have Number 1 hit record with "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow”.” In checking this edit out I discovered that the Andrews Sisters had two # 1 hits, including the lamentably rarely heard Merry Christmas Polka. There could be others, (the McGuire Sisters', # 1 Lonesome Polecat might be fun to hear) but one example is enough. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also don’t forget The Fontane Sisters cover of Hearts of Stone and, of course, The Chordettes wonderful Mr. Sandman. Please excuse me but I am having fun and there really is no one else who probably cares. Assuming that you do. Carptrash (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source I’ve been using only goes back to 1940, but in the liner notes for “The Boswell Sisters Collection 1925-36” one finds that The Object of My Affection was their “only No. 1 hit”, in 1935, so add them to the list. Carptrash (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Majethia (Saurashtra cricketer)

The article Majethia (Saurashtra cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet WP:CRIN, also not enough information to make a proper encyclopedia entry

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MutchyMan112 (talk) 19:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Agar (cricketer)

The article Andrew Agar (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only reference is subscription-based

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl | talk 17:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Davies

The article Kim Davies has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sincerely, Redactyll (talk) 04:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bobo192. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balbhadra Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Balbhadra Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ImmortalWizard(chat) 13:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobo. Probably best to not take the bait with their forum-shopping. We both know that the core values of WP:CRIC are not going to change due to this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A toast sandwich for you!

Thanks for your help! ImmortalWizard(chat) 18:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Bobo192 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak
Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Battersbee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Battersbee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Battersbee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dean Dass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean Dass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Dass until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of N. Kumara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N. Kumara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Kumara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 07:24, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. Gamit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. Gamit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Gamit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 07:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dharmasdrasinhji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dharmasdrasinhji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharmasdrasinhji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 08:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehta (Uttar Pradesh cricketer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 15:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sunil Jadhav

The article Sunil Jadhav has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Harrias ^talk 09:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. Mukherjee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Mukherjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Mukherjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 20:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfD of initial only cricketers

Hi Bobo. Don't feel too disheartened about the deletion of cricketers where only a first initial and a last name is known. I think it's an important compromise to get the "oh he only played one first-class match" off our back when he have all the biographical details. The Indian teams need lists, there's always those they can redirected too, though the lists need alot of work. All the best StickyWicket (talk) 22:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P. Atkins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Atkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Atkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 05:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zafarullah Jan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zafarullah Jan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafarullah Jan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Pontificalibus 11:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Barua for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Barua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Barua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 05:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Balbhadra Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balbhadra Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balbhadra Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 10:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gwalior players

I assume you'll see this on the AfD for Singh, but it appears as if Gwalior players are included on the List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers. I've not checked all of them, but that looks to be the case. So at least one list exists! :-) Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Dotiwala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Dotiwala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Dotiwala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 06:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akhlaq Qureshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhlaq Qureshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhlaq Qureshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of T. Wilson (Middlesex cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. Wilson (Middlesex cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Wilson (Middlesex cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 10:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've added some more material to this article. It will be interesting to see if what I've added is enough to take it over other editors' thresholds for tolerance. Kind regards. Johnlp (talk) 00:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Vanspal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Vanspal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Vanspal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 10:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P. Imadura for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Imadura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Imadura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dee 03 16:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Balac

The article Michael Balac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Balac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Balac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Balac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timothy Machin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Machin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Machin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theprussian (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Bobo192 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Bobherry Talk Edits 01:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Anniversary Admin!

	Happy Anniversary Admin!
	Sending some anniversary wishes! The9Man \| (talk) 11:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Peter Whittingham

On 19 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Peter Whittingham, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Kees08 (Talk) 17:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Audrish Banerjee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audrish Banerjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrish Banerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ziauddin (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ziauddin (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziauddin (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 12:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amanullah (Khairpur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanullah (Khairpur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanullah (Khairpur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harrias ^talk 12:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manu Bhardwaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manu Bhardwaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manu Bhardwaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer)

The article Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, Not Notable and credible

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roller26 (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Del Newman

I've edited his article to reflect your version from August 11 (passed away yesterday), no offense intended, but I'd be interested in knowing the source your edit. Just trying to improve Wikipedia here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:153:881:3D60:9091:73B9:E4D6:FD2D (talk) 03:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, ~ Amkgp 💬 04:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Bobo192. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Martin (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Martin (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Martin (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roller26 (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CRIN

For the most part I agree with you Bobo192, I'm not overly bothered about one FC/LA players being redirected (though they seem reluctant to even do that), I think my larger problem is with certain users who have appeared who have not contributed anything in the way of new articles or expansions to cricket articles. I look through some of the names at that notability discussion and hardly any have previously contributed to the cricket project in a constructive manner, yet feel they have some inherent right to dictate to the project what can and can't be done. By all means make suggestions, but at least get some constructive article contributions behind you and some respect in the project first. Why should I get the likes of John Manners to GA and contribute articles, even on minor players in the grand scheme where I exhaustively research them, only for users who contribute nothing in the way of expanding our content to think its their personal play thing. Nah, that is earned, don't you think? For that reason, I'm a bit like you, I can't be arsed. Sad I know, because even looking at the project talk page you know it's dead, with more and more contributors being driven away. StickyWicket (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anwar Ali (Kalat cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anwar Ali (Kalat cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anwar Ali (Kalat cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Jabbar (Kalat cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Jabbar (Kalat cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Jabbar (Kalat cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Razzaq (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Razzaq (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Razzaq (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zia Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zia Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zia Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naseer Ahmed (WAPDA cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naseer Ahmed (WAPDA cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseer Ahmed (WAPDA cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Naeem (Pakistan Air Force cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Naeem (Pakistan Air Force cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Naeem (Pakistan Air Force cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Ayub (cricketer, born 1965) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Ayub (cricketer, born 1965) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ayub (cricketer, born 1965) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sajid Mohsin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajid Mohsin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajid Mohsin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Umar (East Pakistan cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Umar (East Pakistan cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Umar (East Pakistan cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1969) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1969) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1969) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naseer Ahmed (cricketer, born 1972) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naseer Ahmed (cricketer, born 1972) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseer Ahmed (cricketer, born 1972) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Majid Habib for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majid Habib is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid Habib until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asad Afridi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asad Afridi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Afridi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Livingstone (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Livingstone (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Livingstone (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Sheraz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Sheraz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Sheraz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 23:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imtiaz Ahmed (Sukkur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imtiaz Ahmed (Sukkur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imtiaz Ahmed (Sukkur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siddiq Khan (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siddiq Khan (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddiq Khan (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aziz-ur-Rehman (Sukkur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aziz-ur-Rehman (Sukkur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz-ur-Rehman (Sukkur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Burhanuddin (Sukkur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burhanuddin (Sukkur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burhanuddin (Sukkur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mushtaq Butt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mushtaq Butt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mushtaq Butt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nasim Ahmed (Khairpur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nasim Ahmed (Khairpur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasim Ahmed (Khairpur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Burhanuddin (Khairpur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burhanuddin (Khairpur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burhanuddin (Khairpur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inam-ul-Haq (East Pakistan cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inam-ul-Haq (East Pakistan cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inam-ul-Haq (East Pakistan cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A. Bouch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Bouch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Bouch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Black (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Black (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Black (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Allen (cricketer, born 1903) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Allen (cricketer, born 1903) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Allen (cricketer, born 1903) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leslie Anderson (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie Anderson (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Anderson (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Andrew (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Andrew (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Andrew (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Beal (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Beal (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Beal (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 13:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hi. Please refrain from WP:Casting aspersions and remain WP:CIVIL during all discussions; discuss only content and do not speculate or make insinuations about what you may believe to be the motives of others. I have brought this to your attention on several occasions, yet this problematic behaviour continues at both at AFD and WT:CRIC. It really must stop now. Regards. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 17:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're going to have to be more specific than that. I am not "casting aspersions". Bobo . 17:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And again. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 19:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will gladly accept an answer when an answer is given. Thanks. Bobo . 19:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Ayub (cricketer, born 1915) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Ayub (cricketer, born 1915) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ayub (cricketer, born 1915) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naseer Ahmed (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naseer Ahmed (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseer Ahmed (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azhar Ali (Omani cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azhar Ali (Omani cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azhar Ali (Omani cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have mail!

Hello, Bobo192. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

StickyWicket (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Town(film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Town(film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 29#The Town(film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clive Ricks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clive Ricks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clive Ricks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Milindu Fernando for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milindu Fernando is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milindu Fernando until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of N. Kariyawasam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N. Kariyawasam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Kariyawasam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deepal Peiris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepal Peiris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepal Peiris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P. Paranamanage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Paranamanage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Paranamanage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jayathu Neelaweera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayathu Neelaweera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayathu Neelaweera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ushan Dinuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ushan Dinuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ushan Dinuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of L. Rahman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Rahman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varghese Daniel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varghese Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varghese Daniel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. Rayeez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Rayeez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Rayeez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mandapati Subba Rao for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mandapati Subba Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandapati Subba Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kailasapathi Rao for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kailasapathi Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kailasapathi Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Harinarayana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Harinarayana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Harinarayana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Jaffery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Jaffery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Jaffery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Gulzar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Gulzar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Gulzar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1972) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1972) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1972) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1970) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1970) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Khan (cricketer, born 1970) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Ilyas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Ilyas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Ilyas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Malik (Quetta cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Malik (Quetta cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Malik (Quetta cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Munir (cricketer, born 1978) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Munir (cricketer, born 1978) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Munir (cricketer, born 1978) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naved Bhatti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naved Bhatti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naved Bhatti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Munir (cricketer, born 1973) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Munir (cricketer, born 1973) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Munir (cricketer, born 1973) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Sohail (cricketer, born 1973) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Sohail (cricketer, born 1973) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Sohail (cricketer, born 1973) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aamer Zahid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamer Zahid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Zahid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aslam Manghi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aslam Manghi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aslam Manghi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Afzal (WAPDA cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afzal (WAPDA cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afzal (WAPDA cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1966) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1966) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1966) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1970) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1970) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1970) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1972) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1972) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1972) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sohaib Faisal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sohaib Faisal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohaib Faisal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1973) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1973) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1973) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Umar (Bahawalpur cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Umar (Bahawalpur cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Umar (Bahawalpur cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akbar Khan (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akbar Khan (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akbar Khan (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Afzal Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afzal Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afzal Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amanullah (Kalat cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanullah (Kalat cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanullah (Kalat cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tony Skeggs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Skeggs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Skeggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For being a dormant admin. Störm (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Foot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Foot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Foot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SS Sule for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SS Sule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Sule until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PC Brahmo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PC Brahmo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC Brahmo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheriff Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheriff Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheriff Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David A. Tall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David A. Tall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Tall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Record for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Record is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Record until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K. Bhatnagar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K. Bhatnagar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Bhatnagar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bipul Das for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bipul Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bipul Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GK Bhatnagar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GK Bhatnagar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GK Bhatnagar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VR Ghetge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VR Ghetge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VR Ghetge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CE Holkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CE Holkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CE Holkar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 08:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. Jayasekera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Jayasekera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Jayasekera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SR Kale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SR Kale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SR Kale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zakir Hussain (Assam cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zakir Hussain (Assam cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zakir Hussain (Assam cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Umananda Bora for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umananda Bora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umananda Bora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Cuthill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Cuthill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Cuthill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrian Small for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Small is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Small until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jitender Mehra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jitender Mehra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitender Mehra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kelappan Thampuran (cricketer, born 1925) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelappan Thampuran (cricketer, born 1925) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelappan Thampuran (cricketer, born 1925) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kelappan Thampuran (cricketer, born 1937) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelappan Thampuran (cricketer, born 1937) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelappan Thampuran (cricketer, born 1937) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Forward for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Forward is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Forward until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Stuck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Stuck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Stuck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Austin (Norfolk cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Austin (Norfolk cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Austin (Norfolk cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Tipping for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Tipping is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Tipping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A. Devapriya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Devapriya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Devapriya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Bailey (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Bailey (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Bailey (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Norris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Norris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Norris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anjub Botawala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjub Botawala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjub Botawala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chandulal Banker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chandulal Banker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandulal Banker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deepak Banker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Banker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Banker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. Liyanarachchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. Liyanarachchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Liyanarachchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Love (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Love (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Love (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew White (English cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew White (English cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew White (English cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Goodman (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Goodman (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Goodman (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Errol Mitchell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Errol Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Pike for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Pike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Cannons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Cannons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Cannons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. Ramachandra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Ramachandra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Ramachandra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Wilson (Cumberland cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Wilson (Cumberland cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Wilson (Cumberland cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Don Somasiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Somasiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Somasiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Camplin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Camplin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Camplin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ronald Beeson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald Beeson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Beeson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jon Cade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jon Cade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Cade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trevor Cramar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trevor Cramar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Cramar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Romesh Jayasinghe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Romesh Jayasinghe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romesh Jayasinghe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bimal Jayasekera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bimal Jayasekera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimal Jayasekera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Udesh Wijesuriya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Udesh Wijesuriya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udesh Wijesuriya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maqsood-ul-Haq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maqsood-ul-Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maqsood-ul-Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iftikhar-ul-Haq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iftikhar-ul-Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iftikhar-ul-Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khalifa Abdur Rehman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalifa Abdur Rehman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalifa Abdur Rehman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asif Zahoor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asif Zahoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Zahoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nabeeullah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabeeullah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabeeullah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Cullip for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Cullip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Cullip until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Richardson (Dorset cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Richardson (Dorset cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Richardson (Dorset cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zia-ul-Haque for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zia-ul-Haque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zia-ul-Haque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AR Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AR Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AR Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of T. Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T. Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Devapriya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Devapriya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Devapriya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of R. W. Chandrasiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. W. Chandrasiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. W. Chandrasiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. Sampath for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. Sampath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Sampath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of W. Green (Surrey cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W. Green (Surrey cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Green (Surrey cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ephraim Mokonyama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ephraim Mokonyama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ephraim Mokonyama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 15:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Umar (Quetta cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Umar (Quetta cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Umar (Quetta cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Umar (Lahore cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Umar (Lahore cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Umar (Lahore cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Basit Saeed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basit Saeed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basit Saeed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Bailey (cricketer, born 1943) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Bailey (cricketer, born 1943) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bailey (cricketer, born 1943) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaun Trower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaun Trower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Trower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Pocknee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Pocknee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Pocknee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Lynch (English cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Lynch (English cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Lynch (English cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simon Kelk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Kelk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Kelk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Parkin-Coates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Parkin-Coates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Parkin-Coates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Airey (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Airey (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Airey (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clive Wicks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clive Wicks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clive Wicks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Austin Jelfs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Austin Jelfs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Jelfs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Yakub for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Yakub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Yakub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nadhula de Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadhula de Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadhula de Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Malkin (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Malkin (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Malkin (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AS Irani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AS Irani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Irani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 15:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharat Shah (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharat Shah (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharat Shah (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammad Baluch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammad Baluch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Baluch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harpal Zala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harpal Zala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harpal Zala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iqbal Seth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iqbal Seth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Seth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P. Jadeja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Jadeja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Jadeja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Laheji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Laheji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Laheji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Y. Radia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Y. Radia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Radia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mustafa Shaikh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustafa Shaikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Shaikh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaffar Suleiman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaffar Suleiman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaffar Suleiman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayub Sheikh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayub Sheikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayub Sheikh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oswell Borradaile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oswell Borradaile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oswell Borradaile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Roberts (Shropshire cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Roberts (Shropshire cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Roberts (Shropshire cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naba Bhuyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naba Bhuyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naba Bhuyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mairaj-ul-Hasan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mairaj-ul-Hasan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mairaj-ul-Hasan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashfaq Abbasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashfaq Abbasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashfaq Abbasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Obaidullah Sarwar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obaidullah Sarwar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obaidullah Sarwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zubair Khan (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zubair Khan (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zubair Khan (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Butt (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Butt (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Butt (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 06:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohamed Namiz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Namiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Namiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 10:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marlon Mallawarachchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlon Mallawarachchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon Mallawarachchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 10:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barry Purchase for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Purchase is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Purchase until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's the meaning of this...

I have no doubt that you are well aware of WP:NPA, so would you please explain the meaning of this? _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 15:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have misunderstood my comment above. I was not suggesting that your comment was a personal attack; I was referring only to the comment that was removed from the discussion, in accordance with policy ("derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor."). BTW, it's probably better if you reply (if you feel the need – no obligation, of course) here rather than clogging up the AFD. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 18:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharat Desai (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharat Desai (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharat Desai (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Duminda Wijeweera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duminda Wijeweera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duminda Wijeweera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Essof Ashroff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Essof Ashroff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essof Ashroff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mukesh Desai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mukesh Desai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukesh Desai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Ford (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Ford (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ford (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohamed Zarook for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Zarook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Zarook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dilruk Laurence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dilruk Laurence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilruk Laurence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graeme Carsberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graeme Carsberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graeme Carsberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Perkins (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Perkins (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Perkins (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Powell (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Powell (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Powell (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Coombe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Coombe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Coombe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 13:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent comments

Hello. I'm writing to raise a concern about your recent comments surrounding AFDs, such as impugning editors' motives or maligning their contributions, e.g. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]; the very old and outdated "deletionists v. content creators" malarky, e.g. [9] [10]; and copy-and-paste keep !votes, e.g. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17], among other things. Months ago, an editor made a similar complaint, which you brushed off. [18] According to the tool, your last 180 AFD participations go back to 2005, and over that 16-year period, your AFD match percentage is 53.7% [19]. This is extremely low. (For context/comparison, your last 500 mainspace edits go back to 2012 [20].) I understand that you were active years ago (thank you for your contributions to the project), and I also understand that a number of your article creations have recently been nominated at AFD, and that you've returned to argue "keep". I totally get that having articles you created get nominated for deletion is frustrating; I would be frustrated if I were in your shoes, too. And I get that the website has changed a lot over the last 20 years. But it's not OK to malign our colleagues because they're deleting articles you created; your views on notability clearly don't match the community's, and while you're entitled to have a differing opinion, you're not entitled to create a negative editing environment by impugning other editors because you disagree with them about notability, or spamming AFDs with copy and paste keep !votes. Some leeway on this is certainly deserved, but you've been at this for months now, and so I ask you to make the necessary adjustments here. Thanks, Levivich ^harass/_hound 17:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On a related note; most (if not all) of these AFDs have the rationale "Fails WP:GNG", often with a little extra explanation or background. You seem intent on attacking these side notes while ignoring the key issue. Please can you shift your focus onto the GNG issues, as that is what most of these AFDs will ultimately be decided on. Thanks. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your comments at the ANI thread - they were very much appreciated. Take care. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timothy Machin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Machin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Machin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 22:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger Burley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Burley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Burley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 01:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prem Bhatia (Gujarat cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prem Bhatia (Gujarat cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Bhatia (Gujarat cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 01:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Subhash Bhatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhash Bhatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Bhatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 01:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chiranjit Dhir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chiranjit Dhir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiranjit Dhir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 01:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gayan Wimalashantha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gayan Wimalashantha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayan Wimalashantha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 01:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Wille for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Wille is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Wille until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 01:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Smith (cricketer, born 1854) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Smith (cricketer, born 1854) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Smith (cricketer, born 1854) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Smith (cricketer, born 1905) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Smith (cricketer, born 1905) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Smith (cricketer, born 1905) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Coles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Coles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Coles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wayne Ritzema for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne Ritzema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Ritzema until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim Stonock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Stonock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Stonock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Gribble for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Gribble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Gribble until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gerald Trump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 02:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Traylor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Traylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Traylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Powell (cricketer, born 1982) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Powell (cricketer, born 1982) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Powell (cricketer, born 1982) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Pollard (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Pollard (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Pollard (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denzil Owen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denzil Owen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denzil Owen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Whyborn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Whyborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Whyborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 07:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Williams (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Williams (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Williams (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benjamin Banks (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Banks (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Banks (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan Dean (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Dean (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Dean (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simon Steel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Steel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Steel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simon Davis (English cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Davis (English cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Davis (English cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tahir Kazmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tahir Kazmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Kazmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 22:12, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still about?

Hi Bobo. Noticed all is quiet from you. Hope you haven't retired!!! StickyWicket (talk) 21:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zoheb Sharif for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoheb Sharif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoheb Sharif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 14:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mehraj Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mehraj Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehraj Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muazam Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muazam Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muazam Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gul Khan (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gul Khan (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gul Khan (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1955) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1955) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rehman (cricketer, born 1955) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 21:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jahid Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jahid Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahid Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 18:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pallav Kumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pallav Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pallav Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kurunegala Sports Club cricketers

A tag has been placed on Category:Kurunegala Sports Club cricketers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Whitbread for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Whitbread is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Whitbread until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 12:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Allen (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Allen (cricketer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Allen (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 4meter4 (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Strong

The article Paul Strong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable cricketer, fails WP:NCRICKET, unsourced since 2009

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CiphriusKane (talk) 01:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Strong

RE this edit summary, I PRODed it because I believe it fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRICKET (I did check, but with that generic a name finding sources is near impossible and it looks like he was a non-notable cricketer) and had naething to do with getting "eyes on an article". Nae particularly happy about the implication that I'd misuse the PROD system CiphriusKane (talk) 03:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No chance this article would survive at AfD, so I've boldly redirected it to the list of Bucks List A players per the outcome of numerous AfDs on similar articles earlier in the year. It seems clear that there are many others in that list (and similar lists) that warrant the same treatment. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it, both the WP:NCRIC guideline, and the expanded WP:CRIN essay, have been updated; from the explanatory supplement WP:OFFCRIC: "The Cricket WikiProject deems only matches between two first-class counties as being notable enough to presume coverage in English and Welsh List A tournaments". _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 15:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

—— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rohit Awasthy

The article Rohit Awasthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Biography of a living person lacks notability and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JETH888 message me 14:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rohit Awasthy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohit Awasthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Awasthy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JETH888 message me 04:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanjay Awasthy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Awasthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Awasthy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanjay Awasthy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Awasthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Awasthy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A token of thanks

Hi Bobo192! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gastón Arizaga

The article Gastón Arizaga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the revised WP:NCRIC notability guidelines for cricketers as he did not appear in the final of an ICC Trophy event. No List A appearances.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Pablo Ryan

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bobo192/UBX

I hope you don't mind that I edited User:Bobo192/UBX. I came to it because it was listed at Lint errors: Miscellaneous issues. I was about to save my edit and discovered you had deleted a large portion of the page, so nearly all of my fixes went away.

Please be aware that Wikipedia now uses HTML5, and the markup for centering table cells should be changed from align="center" (with or without quotes) to style="text-align:center".

The markup for vertical aligning table rows should be changed from valign="top" (with or without quotes) to style="vertical-align:top".

The markup for background color should be changed from bgcolor="red" (with or without quotes) to style="background:red". When the color uses hexadecimal digits, the # symbol is mandatory in the new markup.

Font styling for table cells can usually be accomplished with <span>...</span> rather than <div>...</div>, and if the style applies to the whole table cell, it can be merged with the style info before the table cell, for example, style="text-align:center; background:blue; color:white".

Cheers, —Anomalocaris (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Australian cricketers

Hey Bobo. Can't find your old lists for 'redlinked' cricketers, maybe I'm losing the plot! I created 2 articles yesterday on a couple of Australian cricketers and had me wondering if they were the last two Aussies needing articles. Do your lists suggest that as well? StickyWicket (talk) 10:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Bobo192 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Buckley (cricketer, born 1875)

The article George Buckley (cricketer, born 1875) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates the general criteria of WP:NOTDATABASE, and fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT #5. Also fails WP:NOLYMPICS, as only two teams participated. An attempt to find additional sources failed, and WikiProject Cricket was also unable to help.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 07:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Buckley (cricketer, born 1875) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Buckley (cricketer, born 1875) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Buckley (cricketer, born 1875) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A. Karunakaran (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Karunakaran (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Karunakaran (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barun Das (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barun Das (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barun Das (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gideon Barnard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gideon Barnard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon Barnard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD !votes

I noticed that a few of your recent AfD votes appeal to deprecated guidelines such as presumed notability for international Cricket players, and you've also asked for a procedural keep on the grounds that the nom did not go to WT:CRICKET first (if I'm understanding this correctly). Your comments will carry far greater weight if you can demonstrate that the article has sufficient SIGCOV sourcing to meet NSPORTS. Please refrain from making further !votes that are not based on our current policies and guidelines, as this is confusing and disruptive to the AfD process. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 14:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abhishek Sinha

The article Abhishek Sinha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. nirmal (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blindly remove proposed deletion tags like you did here, as it will now need to go through the formality of AFD (unless you WP:G7 it?). From a quick check of the external link, it is clear that this player has been confused with the similarly named Avishek Sinha. Having found the correct profile on CA, it's apparent that the only known match played by Abhishek Sinha (actually Abheek Sinha) was at under-15 level, so he utterly fails even the old NCRIC. This is yet another illustration of the problems with robotically copying from a database of questionable reliability in an attempt to create complete sets. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 08:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, there is zero basis for claiming "we've been good at finding new information lately. It is likely there is more information floating around somewhere". Countless AFDs have demonstrated that the opposite is true. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 08:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Eighteenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Bobo192. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:42, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kapila Dareeju

The article Kapila Dareeju has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails [WP:NCRIC], only played a single game.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Carver1889 (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than aware of the changes made to sports notability guidelines, particularly NCRIC, during the last year or so. With that in mind, please do not remove prod tags with spurious reasoning as you did here – it could easily be considered disruptive. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 18:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kapila Dareeju for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kapila Dareeju is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapila Dareeju until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Carver1889 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danushka Samarakoon

The article Danushka Samarakoon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NATHLETE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 07:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I ask again, please do not contest proposed deletions and insist on AFDs when there is no reasonable expectation that the subject meets the requirements for a standalone article, i.e. significant coverage in reliable (secondary) sources independent of the subject. Please note, several contributors have recently been topic banned from deletion related activity for similar actions. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danushka Samarakoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danushka Samarakoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danushka Samarakoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Gladwin (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Gladwin (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Gladwin (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krishantha Ukwatte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishantha Ukwatte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishantha Ukwatte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 04:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cameron Green (English cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cameron Green (English cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Green (English cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamal Kiriella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamal Kiriella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamal Kiriella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Praneeth Hewage

The article Praneeth Hewage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRICKET. Also, seemingly unsourced BLP, but I wasn't sure if it was eligible for BLPPROD due to external link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TartarTorte 17:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Praneeth Hewage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Praneeth Hewage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praneeth Hewage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TartarTorte 21:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Bobo192!

Happy New Year!

Bobo192,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Potter (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Potter (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Potter (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tails Wx 04:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I. Liyanage

"Imal Liyanage (cricketer, born 1977)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Imal Liyanage (cricketer, born 1977) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 19 § Imal Liyanage (cricketer, born 1977) until a consensus is reached. KatPro (mrow?) 21:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daryll Reddington for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daryll Reddington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daryll Reddington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Popo Dameron talk 00:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imal Liyanage (cricketer, born 1977) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imal Liyanage (cricketer, born 1977) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imal Liyanage (cricketer, born 1977) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikhil Chopra

The article Nikhil Chopra has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barney Cutbill

The article Barney Cutbill has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Gunary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Gunary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Gunary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BilledMammal (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All the best

2.99.208.127 (talk) 06:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Nomination of Oswald Martyn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oswald Martyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oswald Martyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TartarTorte 18:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Paul Dickov

Paul Dickov has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of H. Mallawathanthre

The article H. Mallawathanthre has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hongsy (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of H. Mallawathanthre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article H. Mallawathanthre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. Mallawathanthre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hongsy (talk) 04:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charuka Kahagalla

The article Charuka Kahagalla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This cricketer biography article has zero references, one external link, and is not sufficient to establish notability. After searching, found social media and player statistic websites, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of the person. Article was created on 5 October 2009

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Proposed deletion of Shane Cloete

The article Shane Cloete has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wian van Vuuren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wian van Vuuren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wian van Vuuren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hewage Jayaweera

The article Hewage Jayaweera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 06:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ravindra Lakmal

The article Ravindra Lakmal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ravindra Lakmal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravindra Lakmal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravindra Lakmal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C 679 10:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear Bobo192,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Edmondson

The article Peter Edmondson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:SPORTSCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Announcements from WikiProject Cricket

Annual Cricket Newsletter – Issue I, December 2024

• Published by the Cricket WikiProject •
• About the project • Newsroom • Subscribe • Archives •

Annual newsletter to be lauched

WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated.

Project news: Project news from WP:CRIC including the list of Awards presented in 2024 and the final results of Contests held in 2024.
Article news: Article news from WP:CRIC including list of FAC, FLC, FPC, PR, GAN, ITN, RD etc. from 2024.
Cricket news: Summary of International Cricket events took place in 2024 from T20 World Cups to WTC pathway.

You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

Upcoming contests

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024: Nominations will open up in mid-October.
Cricket WikiContest 2025: More details will be revealed soon.
Visit the contests page for the latest information.

Ongoing discussions

A discussion about merging the child WikiProjects WP:IPL, WP:BPL, WP:PSL and WP:LPL back into WP:CRIC as taskforces is currently ongoing in the project talk page.

• Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests •

You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 – Nominations open now!


	Cricket Picture of the Year 2024

Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 Submit your nominations here
• Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Contests • Mailing list • CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators: AssociateAffiliate and Vestrian24Bio •

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]