User talk:InBalance

Hi InBalance, I've added {{dubious}} tags to the bits in Methylsulfonylmethane that are unsourced. Feel free to do this yourself, though if you could use {{subst:dubious}} tags to the bits you don't agree with and say why you feel they are dubious is Talk:Methylsulfonylmethane#Disputed that would be great! I will give the author a fortnight to fix these problems, then I'm removing the edits he hasn't sourced (based on Wikipedia:No original research). - Ta bu shi da yu 05:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Re: Heads up on Natural Selection edit

Your thoughtfulness in contacting me is commendable, but I've had minimal involvement in natural selection. I have edited it recently, yes, but only to revert blatant vandalism. The explanation you give on the article's talk page is rational and one with which I agree; I doubt your removal of the paragraph will meet any opposition. I tracked down the paragraph's introduction to this anonymous edit (8 Nov 2004). Needless to say it's doubtful this user is still amongst us.

Regardless, I want to thank you for your courtesy: I'm sad to observe that reasoned discussion of edits on talk pages is fast becoming a lost art. I hope to see you edit more around here! (PS: When posting a message to a talk page, typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is the customary way to sign.) Cheers, -- Hadal 03:16, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia - Some useful links for you

Hello, InBalance! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ~Kylu (u|t) 07:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

DuncanHill 11:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nck

The article Nck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable about what an abbreviation 'appears' to be. Refs no longer support.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lateg (talk) 11:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The use of &

Please do not use the ampersand in place of the word "and" when writing articles as it is informal writing.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]