User talk:Tejano

This will be a stub until further notice.

Right now I'm getting back into the groove of reading history (my BA is in History/Economics) spurred by the rather pitiful summary of the gold standard here on Wikipedia -- somehow I don't think Nixon was right when he said "We are all Keynesians now."

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 03:53, 30 Dec 2003 (UTC)

User 75.x.x.x

Tanks. But ... how're they gonna do that (block it)? Looks like it's got a dynamic IP address. Whatever. +ILike2BeAnonymous 05:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antiwar.com article

Thanks for your putting to rest this business that that editor had put in about the alleged Israel/9-11 stuff, etc., on the site. I'd been taking it out, but your very well-worded edit summary should make it more difficult to salt the article with this biased material.

By the way, I was surprised to see I'd been here before (comment above), and more surprised that I now have no idea what that was about ... +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 06:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Horton (activist)

Hi. As you are working on this article, it will probably become necessary to do some paring back of the list of people interviewed. For most tv, radio and web commentators, this list is restricted to a few persons of notability. Please view Rachel Maddow, Rush Limbaugh, Rikki Lake for some examples, or feel free to search your favorite interviewers to see how those pages look. For some additional suggestions, you might also check WP:STYLE. Best regards --OliverTwisted ^(Talk)(Stuff) 07:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tejano! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 710 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Scott Horton (radio host) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Horton (radio host)

The article Scott Horton (radio host) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines for creative professionals. Horton appears to be relatively prominent in certain circles but I can't find any evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 11:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Horton (radio host) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Horton (radio host) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Horton (radio host) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Scott Horton (radio host)

Hello, Tejano

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username PK650 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Scott Horton (radio host), should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Horton (radio host) (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PK650}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

PK650 (talk) 09:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Horton (radio host) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Horton (radio host) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Horton (radio host) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PK650 (talk) 09:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]