User talk:Wartortle
Hi. I noticed you've been voting on VfD a lot lately, with no explanatory comments. Are you just voting randomly, or is there a reason for your votes? For example, I can't fathom why you would want to keep R P Sandbox, an obvious test page that's not even close to an article. --Delirium 23:17, Oct 15, 2003 (UTC)
Hi, I also came here to comment about your desire to KEEP the R P Sandbox article. Clearly you are not looking at the articles are just putting registering your delete vote. It would catch up to you eventually. How can you be an admin with this kind of behaviour? If there is no reason put here or on my talk page dave, if I get around to it, I'd put you down for requests for de-adminship. dave 04:21, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- What the hell am I talking about, you're not even an admin... Forget it then. dave 04:27, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Hello, Wartortle. I also stopped by to ask why you want to keep Dork and some other articles, but it seems I'm not the first. I am curious about your reasons. Please do post them when you're saying why you want to keep something -- especially if no one else wants to keep it. -- Cheers, BCorr ? Брайен 21:52, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Just adding my noise to the din... voting en masse to keep articles with no explanations isn't really going to get you any credibility. --Dante Alighieri 21:57, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
I vote to ban this user. dave 01:44, 23 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- At the very least their votes should be disregarded. It looks like they're trying to cause problems with the already very weak deletion 'system'. Maximus Rex 04:05, 23 Oct 2003 (UTC)
WHOA! A little patience please. He's only voted a few times. But Wartortle read Wikipedia:Deletion policy and give a reason when you vote on the votes for deletion page. Fred Bauder 11:37, 23 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Nomination of Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)