User talk:Magabund
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 12:45, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Reverts
[edit]Hey buddy, I'm sorry but you have reverted my edits to B'nai Brith twice without stating cause. You have ignored protocol by failing to disclose your reasons for your edits in the talk page. Please refrain from doing so, and try and give arguments for backing your edits up. I clearly stated why the definition of B'nai Brith as an anti-racist organization could, at a minimium be described as inflammatory given current world politics. Please see the relevant talk page if you wish to discuss it. Cheers! Nlsanand 08:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, man! Sorry, if there was any confusion. Nlsanand 01:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
OBL worldwide perception article AFD
[edit]You might be interested in this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide perception of Osama bin Laden
Israeli Apartheid talk page
[edit]You seem to have deleted someone else's comments while you were adding your own [1]. I'm not sure what happened, or else I would tell you what to be careful about. Since I don't know, just try to be careful. Good luck. Jd2718 09:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was not aware, fixed already. --Magabund 09:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Oktar as Holocaust denier
[edit]Here you can find a part of Oktar's old website from 1999:[2]
The agreement concerning the transfer of the Jews to Palestine concluded between the Zionists and the Nazis was interrupted when the war broke out. Then it was not possible to keep on the transfer carried out by German ships. Thus, Hitler concluded together those Jews in concentration camps in order to preserve the process of isolation and make use of their men power. The camps in question; Auschwitz, Majdenek, Treblinka, Sobibor and many others were labour camps and just they were constructed near big industrial complexes. Suprisingly Zionists did not object to Hitler's plan. What is presented as Holocaust is the death of some Jews due to the tiffus plague during the war and the famine towards the end of the war caused by the defeat of the Germans.
I must say it looks like Holocaust Denial to me. Jeff5102 20:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tel Aviv Jerusalem bus 405 massacre
[edit]Talk:Tel Aviv Jerusalem bus 405 massacre From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
[edit] Massacre?
Are you really sure that it is NPOV to describe it as "massacre" and "suicide attack" ? --Magabund 14:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Massacre is defined as the mass killing of unarmed people, which this attack qualifies as. The Boston Massacre and Wounded Knee Massacre are other examples. Driving a bus off a cliff qualifies as a suicide attack, as long as the attacker has suicidal intent, it's a suicide attack, even though he or she may not be ultimately successful in committing suicide.--64.75.187.196 (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Read the NPOV, massacre, and suicide attack articles if you want to make sure. This is just for your information.--Exander (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Nazi, Swastika References Being Purged from Syrian Social Nationalist Party
[edit]Would you mind having a look at the problem of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party's Nazi history and swastika flag being systematically deleted/vandalized? This removes an important aspect of neutrality from the article. References from many reliable sources are provided. See its talk page. The edits are being done by users with IP addresses from very similar domains. Thanks, Histopher Critchens (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Does not seem to be any IP that I am aware of. --Magabund (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Syrian Army
[edit]That edit was neither anon nor POV, as you would have found by looking at the edit history. Be more careful next time. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)