Talk:Habituation

A summary of this article appears in learning.

This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.

The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below.

Untitled

I tried to dissacotiate habituation with habit and fixed up some incorrect definitions. I suggest to combine habituation and sensitization to a combined article on nonassociative learning. fkeel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.135.23.227 (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are some problems with the grammar and semantics of the article, and there was already a citation template on here. I think some attention is needed. E.g. "Both adults and infants gaze lesser at a particular visual stimulus" is poor English, "repetition of certain behaviors that are rewarding to a life form" is stylistically strange, "one can detect the smallest degree of difference that is detectable" is tautological. Also it is not clear whether the article as about psychology or biology since I don't think psychology considers protozoans. Oliver Low (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS NON-ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING

Could someone knowledgeable in the field please explain that to the layman at the beginning of the article? I have no idea what it means. Spalding 19:05, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

It functions like an average weighted history wavelet interference filter

??? I have seen models using low-pass filters, a wavelet-filter is usually some kind of bandpass filter, meaning there is a preferred frequency. What would that frequency be then?

or short: please explain!

--Maddanio 10:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kelsfann.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

addiction

Can a habit be considered an addiction? I mean, for example some people can't go a day without smoking a cigarette, and sometimes do it without thinking. I can't determine the stimulus besides chemicals in the brain washing about but... please explain.

Habituation would be more like getting used to cigarette smoke and not noticing it so much when entering a room. Richard001 03:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a bit confused, it commences with the correct definition of habituation and then gets habituation and habit mixed up. Habituation is a gradual reduction in response to a specific stimulus over time, and as such is the opposite of addiction. Although addiction may incorporate some element of habituation,in that the dosage of a stimulant drug needed to produce the effect desired may increase over time, the addictive drive to consume the drug does not reduce. True habituation reduces the value of the stimulus, encouraging the organism to move on to a different stimulus (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect) APM Feb 25 2009

Why isn't there an article closer to the ordinary sense of habit?

I'm glad this article makes sense to psychologists, but it does not address what ordinary people mean when they refer to habits. There must be something intelligent that can be said about habits. You'd think we could edit something out of William James' The Principles of Psychology (the book, NOT the article) that people would find comprehensible and would provide a bridge to contemporary psychological and psychotherapeutic thought. DCDuring 01:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are looking for Habit (psychology)? Richard001 20:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Background section?

The author of this section seems confused about the meaning of the term as it applies in this context (as a psychology term). Habituation does not refer to things done out of habit, as the section seems to imply, but rather refers exclusively to the diminishment of a response due to repeated introductions of a stimulus. For example, seeking out food is not a habituated response. The food (stimulus) will continue to elicit eating (response) if the animal is to survive. What this describes is a habit, not habituation. To say an animal has been habituated to food would be to say the animal is no longer very interested in eating due to the repeated presence of food (though not to be confused with satiety).

It is true that acclimation and habituation are similar, with acclimation describing a decreased response to the environment as a whole rather than a single distinct stimulus. Habituation is also essential to our ability to discern important stimuli from background noise, like the section notes. However, most of the rest of the section needs to be rewritten to avoid confusion over the meaning of the term. --Foxhound199 (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neurobiology section

Neurobiology of Habituation It is a neutral form of learning in which a neutral stimulus is repeated many times. The first time it is applied it is novel and evokes a reaction (the orienting reflex or "what is it?" response). However, it evokes less and less electrical response as it is repeated. Eventually the subject becomes habituated to the stimulus and ignores it. This is associated with decreased release of neurotransmitter from the presynaptic terminal because of decreased intracellular Ca⁺⁺. The decrease in intracellular Ca⁺⁺ is due to gradual inactivation of Ca⁺⁺ channels ^{[citation needed]}.

...

I've placed this section in Talk, as it is:

a) factually inaccurate b) confusing c) very important

I think the author is trying to describe the mechanisms of habituation as mapped out in Aplysia, but I can't tell. If so, it's not entirely correct to say that it's neutral or that a neutral stimulus was used. It's also incorrect to say that habituation doesn't occur until the response is completely extinguished; habituation occurs throughout the process in steps. Also, to describe these mechanisms as underlying all habituation is misleading and potentially inaccurate; for this section to exist it needs to be clear that it describes habituation in a specific circumstance to avoid suggesting that the mechanisms of mammalian behavioral habituation are known and identical.

I'll leave this for a few to see if anyone else chimes in; if not, I'll see about rewriting this and bringing it back. If someone else wants to give it a go, please feel free. :)Abidagus (talk) 08:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paper on History of Habituation

Perhaps this paper could be of use

Thompson, R. F. (2009).Habituation: A History. Neurobiol Learn Mem, 92, 127-134.

Sensitization is not really the opposite of habituation

I noticed in a very brief review one possible error, but I may be wrong, the powers that be may have decided to reorganize their terms. What I've learned is that sensitization is an increase in responding however elicited by a second stimulus (or multiple other stimuli), not the original stimulus (with habituation the decrease is always in reaction to further exposures to the same stimulus). The opposite of habituation would likely be a process called potentiation, and potentiation likely fits the definition given in the Wikipedia entry for sensitization (which is wrong - again if we are going by the sources that I know of - see Catania's "Learning"). The opposite of sensitization I would think would be desensitization, and there is a procedure termed systematic desensitization to help people learn to overcome their fears or phobias (the idea being that the fear or phobia is conditioned via sensitization pairing therefore it can be unconditioned, however if the response is unconditioned then no sensitization occurred and thus also desensitization would likely be ineffective).

I would also say, in the first paragraph that it should be referred to as operant conditioning (when referencing extinction) and not simply say conditioning since many of these respondent processes do in fact involve pairing of stimuli (i.e., conditioning) compare for instance the case of Pavlov who noticed that his student who brought the meat powder, when entering the room with the dog without meat powder, would elicit salvation from the dog and thus screw up all of his original experiments on the salivation process..BenjaminSchooley (talk) 14:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ASD & failure to habituate to social stimulus

General and anecdotal adult self diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder using web questionnaires or magazine articles is now a common place practice that would normally be rightfully considered unscientific and ambiguous. When I read of research showing specific failure to habituate to facial/social stimulus, I think of my friends telling me for years that I was missing the non-verbal cues. Having asperger's syndrome almost purely without any other disorder is rare. Having accelerated language devlopement and high intelligence can compensate for a blind-spot in non-associative/non-verbal skills by using associative learning about social cues, a more arduous and time consuming technique. For all I may have learned, at age 48 I can still easily miss immediately obvious social cues, I still do not sensitise or habituate properly to specific kinds of stimulus though I understand them logically. I am excited to learn that sensitization and habituation research in other species offers the potential of providing an animal model of ASD and other conditions that, as I have been forced to admit about myself, can be so mild in humans they may be thought of as personality variations. 71.212.28.240 (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing your input, but just a kind reminder that these Talk pages are about improving the article rather than a general discussion thread about the topic itself. Humanatbest (talk) 17:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Habituation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927024534/http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/subdep.htm to http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/subdep.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drug habituation

I think the section on drug habituation will be more appropriate in the page about drug tolerance than in habituation.I think there’s too much information in this page. Angunnu (talk) 13:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Accustimisation" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Accustimisation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Accustimisation until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Accustimization" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Accustimization has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Accustimization until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]