User talk:Lkjhgfdsa

Welcome!

Please join us for the next Wikipedia:Bootcamp every night at midnight EST (2100 PST, 0500 UTC) to learn the ropes, or leave a message on our talk pages around that time for on-wiki help.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, Lkjhgfdsa! I hope you like the place and decide to keep contributing. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
One more quick tip: to sign your name on a Talk page like I did below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold!

— Asbestos | Talk 16:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Fanfiction userbox

Because you requested it on Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Ideas, I made a fanfiction userbox. {{User:BDWill/fanfiction}}

This user writes fanfiction.

--BDWill Talk 09:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No prob

"Thank you for creating the fanfiction userbox."

No problem. --BDWill Talk 01:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD on Notability

Do you know who deleted the No Notability template prematurely with no notices, didn't close the TfD debate, and didn't reflect consensus? -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 13:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User no notability template

You requested the SC for the template you put on tfd:

NN	This user hates notability and how it is used mercilessly on AfD as policy.

there's a milder version available on the Deletion Review page. -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 05:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Edriss 562

Thanks for the compliment! I was afraid I might have gone overboard, I'm always hesitant to be bold. Thanks also for correcting me about Chapman being infested. I thought he had only cooperated without being a controller, which he did, but I'd forgotten that Sub-Visser 7 had infested him at one point. Karwynn 18:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Drode/Capasin

Hey! I didn't realize I was not logged in when I made the edits to those Animorph pages.

Although none of the books flat out describe the Drode as being Capasin, descriptions of both the Capasin and Drode as consistent and very similar. Some of these descriptions include multi-jointed limbs, the beak like face, the color and texture of the skin, and, most importantly, the color of the eyes. Descriptions of the Drode and Capasin eyes are extremely alike, especially when both the creatures die, because both set of eyes change color.

So technically, although it does not say the Drode is a Capasin, there is easily enough evidence to deduce the fact that he is one. I am sure that there are more points that I have overlooked.

Cowbellallen 22:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For being the first person to come up with something legible in dactylic hexameter! I appreciate those who put time and thought into their 'vandalism'. Ziggurat 20:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Animorphs

You seem to be an active Animorphs editor, so I wanted your opinion of some proposed mergers. I personally think that Hedrick Chapman and Tom Berenson are too short and relatively minor characters - I think they ought to be merged into List of minor humans (Animorphs). Also, the Erek King article seems a little short - should he be merged into the List of minor Animorphs characters? What do you think? Hbdragon88 18:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. While it is true that Visser One was just a rank and held by two people within the Animorphs continuity, for 45 books it was used to exclusively refer to just Edriss 562. I think naming conventions generally dictate the most knonw name. That's why I moved redirected the Esplin 9466 article to Visser Three, as he is almost exclusively referred to by that name, even when he becomes Visser One. The only notable reference to the name "Edriss 562" is in Visser, otherwise she is refered to as "Marco's mother" or "Visser One". Thus, I'd either favor moving the Edriss 562 article to Visser One or to recreate the article as it was before I redirected it. Hbdragon88 06:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My thought exaclty about the species...way too many stubs. That was going to be my next major project after I finished up merging and cleaning up the character pages. They look much better now, but I could still copyedit them up and add all the information I remember. Go ahead and merge the species articles - you have my support. Hbdragon88 06:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: K. A. Applegate; Mail transfer agent; PDD not otherwise specified; J.A.R.; Pope Innocent XIII; James Stirling (mathematician); Galiash; Joan Aiken; Hyannis, Massachusetts; Anders Celsius; Janet Waldo; Pope Benedict XIII; Charles Emmanuel I, Duke of Savoy; The Sharing; Coalition Casualties in 2003-2004 Iraq War; Random access memory; Graffen's Children; Chadoo; Ed Roth

Cleanup: Green Day discography; Saturday; World Wide Web Consortium
Merge: DOS; Autistic community; Autistic culture
Add Sources: December; Alex Rodriguez; Nazi hunter
Wikify: Steve DeVito; Lanford Wilson; Shipping Container Architecture
Expand: Longview (song); Eberswalde; Chess Life

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gedd

Book #6: The Capture!

When the Yeerk in Jake's head is dying, he "sees" the minds of the previous hosts (Tom, a Hork Bajir, and a Gedd) and he comments "And along with the Yeerk's own memories, I began to see the minds of his hosts. The Gedd who had a name no human could hope to pronounce." It also talks about the fear and bewilderment the Gedd felt a little earlier in the story.

Poor little monkey men. :(

Huggernaut 03:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for Gamebox!

Great idea... ++Lar: t/c 17:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.--Lkjhgfdsa 18:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Latin userbox

Thanks for point that out! I've had that up on my page for several weeks, and I've suprisingly never noticed that there were two of the same userboxes...I think I need more sleep >.<. Fabricationary 01:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

85.166.27.251 here. I made a user like you said, partially because i'm going to do some major changes to the Battle Angel Alita articles in the future.

Animorphs Books

Just thought I'd run an idea by you; would it be worth moving the Chronicles books from the page for #51-#54 to the Megamorphs/Alternamorphs page? I thought it might be easier if we had all of the "special books" located on the one page. Also, are we able to provide cover images for every book, or does this break Wikipedia copyright? Cheers =) --Matt 08:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm thinking perhaps a page for each book will work, there's certainly enough content to make the pages meaningful. I've done the page for The Invasion, any comments or suggestions?

Green Day is the worst band in the world. Why dont you try listening to real music by real musicians for a change?

A void

Thank you for that lipogrammatic barnstar you put on my talk. I will polish it and display it proudly! I am happy that you found my plot synopsis worth contributing. Carry on your own good work! --<Mnbvcxz ♬ talk 07:27, 14 Oct 2006 (UTC)

Adminship?

Hello Kizor: I came across you from your expansion of The Attack. You seem to be a dedicated and productive user, and I would like to nominate you for adminship. Would you mind that?--Lkjhgfdsa 21:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would. Don't think that I don't appreciate the sentiment in a goggle-eyed fashion, but at the moment it'd blow up spectacularily in our faces. I've been (and still am) involved in some debates where I let things get to me and conducted myself like an idiot. I need to better myself and take some distance from them. In addition I currently risk flunking college if I ramp my Wikipedia commitments up further and, well, I'm just a regular guy! :P --Kizor 14:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Your recent vandalism to Canada, Right-wing politics‎, and Christopher Columbus are concerning. Please stop or you will be blocked from editing. Thanks, DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Looking at your contributions, I saw it was an anomaly and suspected as much. Had the edits continued I was prepared to request a block for a suspected compromised account but, fortunately, it stopped. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on the OR noticeboard (including answer here)

That would be a descriptive claim about the contents of a primary source whose applicability is easily verifiable and obvious to any reasonable, educated person without the need for specialized knowledge — and therefore not OR. Go for it :D Mr. IP 《Defender of Open Editing》 17:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:LifeGen.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LifeGen.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alloran-Semitur-Corrass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alloran-Semitur-Corrass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alloran-Semitur-Corrass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 21:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]