Jump to content

Talk:Minimal music

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article title: change to "Minimal music"

[edit]

it struck me that the term "minimalist music" is incorrect. It seems the original term, "minimal music," after Nyman and Mertens, is used more widely.For example:

"minimal music" v "minimalist music," common usage survey based on search hits.
google -> 908000 to 221000
google books -> 10400 to 2870
google scholar -> 1010 to 596
JSTOR -> 212 TO 126
Perspectives of New Music (journal sample) -> 15 to 5
Fink (2005) (recent publication example) -> 79 to 14

I feel it would be appropriate to change the title accordingly and will do so unless there are any good reasons not to. Only instances of the expression "minimalist music" will change, the term "minimalist composer" remains. Any thoughts on this? --Semitransgenic (talk) 23:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The term Terry Riley prefers is "Psychedelic music", and it is far more accurate. Anything by these "minimalist" guys is such a note soup that to call it "minimal" is a joke. The term "psychedelic" fell out of favor with the elites around 1968, when it was appropriated by the proletariat, so a new term was invented. The term "Minimal music" is even stupider, minimalist music is the common usage, although almost no-one self identifies as minimalist. If you want a real minimalist, John Cage is probably the closest thing you'll find in music.69.22.238.161 (talk) 01:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Minimal music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

[edit]

I have reverted User:Gentlecollapse6's change of the article title to "Minimalist music". This was the former article title, changed to "Minimal music" after a brief discussion in 2011 (see above). It seems to me that reverting a previous change should be preceded by a discussion, and consensus of the editors working on this article.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 07:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Byron

[edit]

See: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 May 11#Michael Byron (composer). Hyacinth (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article failed to mention muzak

[edit]

I think the article failed to mention the watered-down music of Muzak, known nowadays as "elevator music". Key feature - inobtrusive. People used to criticise "muzak" for being monotonous, too dull... and, honestly, Muzak sounds like a "minimalsitic" take on classical music to me - one even lighter than light music. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]