Talk:List of kings of Babylon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of kings of Babylon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ancient Near East Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq High‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Lists High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section

The numbering scheme article gives no useful information with respect to numbering of monarchs. We shouldn't include irrelevant links. john 04:32, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

As it's not linked as [[numbering scheme|numbering of monarchs]], but as [[numbering scheme]] it would be highly unusal if it would. Obviously if there were one, this would be a better link. The article lacks wikification BTW. -- User:Docu

In the meantime I added a bit to numbering scheme and I even found the specialized article. Please contribute to the list. -- User:Docu

[ro4444]:

When I edited the Sealand dynasty kings list, there was a nonspecific [5 Kings] in between Gulkishar and Ea-Gamil. I found another list that had four kings in between the two, and edited those in. However, there still may be a king missing from the list.

ok, we are getting to a point where sources should be cited: There are various contradictory lists, and rather than just blending them together, we should explain the situation, and make clear which lists have what. dab (ᛏ) 09:09, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

http://www.hostkingdom.net/ancmesop.html#Babylon

hostkingdom generally has reliable lists, which is why I use it.User:Ro4444

I'm afraid you don't understand. With 'sources' I don't mean web pages. I mean manuscripts, i.e. the actual lists. the website you give is horribly unencyclopedic, they don't even say which chronology they use. (Middle Chronology?) See [1] for an example of a 'reliable' source, which gives manuscript readings. I honestly don't know how you can decide whether 'hostkingom' is 'reliable', seeing that they give not a single source... dab

(ᛏ) 09:25, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Actually, it has a whole list of sources:

http://www.hostkingdom.net/append.html

With at least a few covering ancient times. Also, the original list was definately created from this webpage: http://www.friesian.com/notes/newking.htm#babylonia Ro4444

Writing conventions and fonts

All the special signs used by Assyriologist when transcribing words from the Akkadian language is not found at Wikipedia, and are very rare fonts anyhow. We should better limit our use to the letters in the English alphabet. This make the words more easy to find and use in an encyclopedia for non-experts. The velar h and the emphatic s and t are better written with plain h, s and t. It is doubtful even if š should be used in favour of sh, at least not in entries without a redirection to -sh-.

I have edited the king list in according to the above. --JFK 14:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, š / Š is included on most Microsoft Windows systems... AnonMoos 08:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasties

There are two Ninth Dynasties. I suspect that the first group is actually part of Dynasty VIII--the website mentioned above as the original source of this list has these kings listed under Dynasty VIII--but I have no knowledge of the subject beyond that page and this, so if someone can back me up on this and fix it, that would be great.

That would clear up the following problem with Dynasty VIII, however, regarding Dynasty VII: a single ruler is not a dynasty. A dynasty is by definition a series of rulers. Perhaps someone could suggest an alternative nomenclature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.66.104 (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Short chronology, Tables

Would there be a problem if I tabulated the king lists and converted them to short chronology? (like the Sumerian king list) Categorystuff (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nabu-kudurri-usur (Nebuchadnezzar II)

There is a difference between the dates in the Table and the Picture and other references. Which Dates are right? 624 – 582 BC or 605–562 BC? 80.187.103.77 (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salted

Gérard Gertoux has been salted for a reason. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]