Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey G

A thirteen year old, scored a perfect forty on the Ohio state's mathematics league exam. Supposedly may very well be among the leading math scholars in the United States. -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 03:21, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Good for him, but vanity. We can list him when he is a leading scholar . -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 03:21, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Delete. RickK 03:22, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete -- Cyrius|&#9998 03:40, Apr 30, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. <sigh> Well, here it is, gang -- 90's vanity. There's gonna be more where this came from. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:03, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. If six others in Ohio in the 7th grade managed that score on the test, I wouldn't say he's worthy of inclusion purely on the basis of that, and there's no other possible claim to fame or importance in the article. Everyking 05:19, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Could someone add Elizabethan era to this list? I tried to last night, but it hasn't shown up yet(I'm new : ) ).--Phil Larin 05:47, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Wile E. has it right. That affair with "John Hassel" has left a particularly nasty taste in my mouth. Therefore, I'm feeling particularly nasty in turn, and it's past my bedtime as well. And Postdlf, would you be kind enough to grab a sack? Another delete is on its way to the Brooklyn Bridge. - Lucky 6.9 06:54, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity page. Alcarillo 07:13, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Uninteresting, no real info, POV. Mike Church 00:54, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- I did some cleaning up on the article; now it's a stub. Still delete, though.
Delete unless his last name can be verified, in which case move to his real name. anthony (see warning)
If he's so famous, how come he doesn't have a last name? Or maybe G is his last name, which would explain the W girl. Now isn't she bold. Since he always has his nose in a book, I doubt he will notice if we DELETE this article. Denni 05:58, 2004 May 2 (UTC)
My olfactory senses tell me that the last paragraph has the aroma of BJAODN candidacy. Delete. Bearcat 06:44, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If he's such a maths prodigy how come he scored more than 100%? garryq 23:18, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Extra credit. 'Tis a common phenomenon in America-- in some placess kids can carry 110%, 120% averages. Still, acing a course or a math test is hardly article-worthy. If he becomes a Putnam fellow, maybe we can include a page for him. Mike Church 01:00, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As the author of this article, I am rolling on the ground laughing at how seriously you all take yourselves. His IQ does happen to be 190, and he has published many interesting theories, but even I agree he is not worth this. Hey Mike Church, you may be my cousin. Aren't you ashamed of me? 205.188.116.83 20:39 3 May 2004 (UTC)
- No one needs to be ashamed of anyone. You're a new user, and sometimes new users make mistakes. I made my share. Don't worry, it's nothing big. Mike Church 02:28, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  - all? all? Gosharoonies, 205.188.116.83 (may I call you 205?), it's easy to tell you're new here. Half the comments in this section are clear examples of Wikipedians at their skeptical, sarcastic best. A good Wikipedian laughs discreetly, you see. Denni 06:27, 2004 May 4 (UTC)