Jump to content

Talk:Consecration in Christianity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

inanimate spelled wrong :)

[edit]

Fixed the word "inanimate" -fm

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consecration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage

[edit]

This article doesn't at present explicitly cover the use of consecration in the Anglican and other western non-RC churches - it is only touched on in the strange "various churches" subsection (which largely duplicates the specifically RC section on Chuches, altars etc). Davidships (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Consecration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unintended insult?

[edit]

In the section on Jainism, reference is made to effigies as "idols". The use of this word for, say, statues in Christianity is highly insulting and shows ignorance of the doctrines applying to their use. Can we assume that followers of Jainism would see no problem with using the term, or is this an error requiring a revision of the text? ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 13:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Church/mosque consecrated to, or dedicated to St X?

[edit]

Is a house of worship always consecrated to God or faith as such, and dedicated to, and named for, a saint or holy concept? Or can it be consecrated to Saint X? In short, is saying "the town chuch/mosque/etc. is consecrated to St X" accurate? Thank you, Arminden (talk) 08:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]