Talk:Radula

	Geology portal Talk:Radula is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cambrian explosion task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Gastropods Top‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Animal anatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cephalopods (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Clarification

"The radula is unique to all mollusks, except the bivalves" - does this mean that it's common to all mollusks except the bivalves? Or is there some subtler distinction that I'm missing? DS 11:55, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I have reworded the sentence. Thanks for notifying. JoJan 13:08, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The picture to go with this article is not loading.

Do you happen to have any citations for these figures or the list of the type of radulas? cause that'd be really helpful to my senior project which is on chiton radulas. thanks

can I just say I really like the top 3 diagrams, we need more like this on wiki :-)

References

With referance to Citation 3, is Undertale a scholarly recourse that we can use on Wikipedia? 19:55, 27 Jul 2016 (GMT)

I've removed that reference, as it was no longer available at its address. The waybackmachine gave an illustration that is not fit for this article. JoJan (talk) 13:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

histology images

Are these images http://www.mollusca.cz/galerie/histology.htm useful for wikipedia? --Snek01 11:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are. The copyright license also falls within the guidelines of Wikipedia Commons . But the description in simple language of these photos in Wikipedia requires a advanced knowledge of malacology. JoJan 13:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author of these histological sections and of these photos. But I can not add better descrition. I have got more photos of respiratory system probably. Any help appreciated. --Snek01 01:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can upload them to the Commons anyway. I'll see what I can do with them. JoJan 15:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Five of them added to commons http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Snek01 --Snek01 00:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the radula of cephalopods? Is it inside a beak or IS it a beak?

Radula vs radular

I see both spellings in the literature. ( Example: "Ultrastructure and development of iron mineralization in the radular teeth of Cryptochiton stelleri (mollusca)" 1967) I suspect radular is the older, British spelling, and the radula spelling without an r came about because of the difference in rotic American pronunciation, but it's only a guess. Anyone able to shed more light on this? radular with an r appears a lot in the older literature, so it might be helpful to briefly mention this in the first line of this article, to help those searching the literature to pick up the older references. 58.96.80.136 (talk) 06:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Checking several dictionaries, the word "radular" is the only accepted adjective of "radula". "Radular" is very common even in recent literature, such as in expressions "radular type", "radular teeth", "radular charachters", "radualr differences", "radular morphology","radular membrane", "radular sac". On the other hand, the "Online Dictionary of Invertebrate Zoology" only mentions "radula sac". You'll probably will need a linguist to give more insight in this matter. JoJan (talk) 14:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]