Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Town rape
Appearance
Questionable and offensive content. If the practice truly exists, then the tone of the article will need changing. Jschwa1 13:16, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - Google shows up nothing for this subject. Muntfish 13:22, 2004 Dec 10 (UTC)
- BJAODN, with just enough offensiveness that people think they have to take it seriously (even in the origional version). This close to being a speedy candidate for vandalism. As is, delete. --L33tminion | (talk) 13:24, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - I find the tone of this article so offensive that I feel it should be a speedy. When this topic is covered it should be in an article called Human rights offenses in Bangladesh or similar. CheekyMonkey 13:26, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find any mention of it. I have heard of similar practices in some primitive cultures but this does not seem to be one. The year 1971 is important in Bangladesh history by the way, so the writer of this article must have done some research. If the article includes some references or authorities, then I'll change my vote to keep (or redirect) Sander123 13:39, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - Delete ASAP. This sounds like horrible unsubstantiated nonsense to me, I'm afraid. Any doubts we might have as to whether the author is taking the p*** are confirmed by his subsequent vandalism of the 'votes for deletion' message. Brequinda 14:18, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: DCEdwards1966 14:26, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy. This is obviously a bad taste joke post. Somebody has a bee in his bonnet about losing the Bangladesh war, I suspect. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 15:54, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 18:20, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Prefarably speedily. -R. fiend 18:35, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)