User talk:Thanos6

From June 16, 2008, 12:24 EST, any discussion started on MY page will be replied to on YOURS. You then reply on mine. Conversational ping-pong, that's what I prefer.

Welcome

Hello Thanos6 and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
You can put pages that you edit on your "watchlist" to keep track of them easier, and see most recent edits to them.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

BCKILLa (talk)

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Warning users

You might warn to warn users such as User:68.12.20.87 with templates such as {{test1}}, {{test2}} to {{test4}} before intiating an RFC. Also, RFC tends to be reserved for user conflicts, simple vandalism can be listed over at WP:VIP once the user has been warned enough times (usually at least 2 or 3, test4 is used as a last warning). Sasquatcht|c 04:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that...I'm sorry, I've never had to report vandalism before and wasn't sure how to go about iht.Thanos6 04:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Riverbanks Zoo

Hey, how you doing? I left you a message in the Riverbanks Zoo article. Be sure to check it out. Thief12 12:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi Thanos6, I just wanted to let you know I reverted the last few edits to your talk page as it was vandalism. I'm going to warn the users who did it too. — Moe ε 01:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quasar Entry Edit

Hi, Thanos6. I saw you added a bit to Quasar's Powers & Abilities. I had some questions about them, so maybe if you have a chance you can check out the Quasar talk page. Thanks!

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 21:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 15% for major edits and 31% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 07:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arch Rivals: A Basket Brawl!

If a page is a duplicate of another page, or covers the same content but in a completely inferior way, there is no need to place it on AFD. You can just make a redirect to the other page instead. To do this, edit the article, remove all the text, and add #REDIRECT [[Other Article Name]]. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 18:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bendis

I've added your criticism back into the writer profile section.--CyberGhostface 19:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jason

Ken was a stunt choredinator, not Jason. If he did any of them it was as a stunt double (which is hard to do since Kane Hodder is already a stunt man). Since Kane played "Jason", his stunt double doesn't count as a "portrayal" even if it was Ken (which you would need a source to prove that anyway, since Kane is already a stunt man and did his stunts). It isn't like the earlier movies where you had "unmasked" and "masked", because they were technically doing the same job, playing the character of Jason, not performing a stunt that the other actors couldn't do. Bignole 15:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as I said, that doesn't make Ken the portrayer of Jason (especially in only 2 shots) when it's meant as a "stunt double". He wasn't acting, he was doing a stunt (granted "acting" is a loose term with this character). Stunt doubles do not count as "portrayers", otherwise Robert England wouldn't be the only person to portray Freddy Krueger. Kane Hodder portrayed Jason in Part 8, while Ken stood in as a stunt double for a couple scenes because of "time restraints". That doesn't classify as an actual portrayal. Bignole 15:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Wydell

This "biograpy" contains copyrighted and unsourced information. The author of this article, CyberGhostface has inserted a number of copyrighted pictures which he cites as being "low-resolution screenshots", when in fact they are not. These pictures are fully copyrighted, the copyright being held by Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation. The article contains unsourced information, and any edits and additions made to this article by wikipedians are reverted back to the original article by it's creator. It seems that CyberGhostface will not allow anyone to edit this article for any reason! -JimmyMack 16:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry he got you involved with this. For the record, this person basically added his own fictional original research into the articles, so he got mad when I removed them. "Anyone" in this case just basically refers to him.--CyberGhostface 21:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The user at the end of the first message is actually Special:Contributions/172.134.129.246, who was trying to conceal his identity under the user JimmyMack, which has no contributions recorded at time of writing. Also, Wikipedia signatures usually have two dashes and not one, for your info. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 07:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crossbones

Thanks for editing "criminal scientist" out of the Crossbones article. I think I must have inadvertently left that there after accidentally pasting some text from the Superia article. Otherwise, I must have been on acid. --Halloween jack 04:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NegaDuck

You added an edit saying the writers had been planning to square the two origin stories in an episode called "Opposites Attack"--do you have a source for that? I found a few mentions of this on the internet but people don't say where they got the information, I'm wondering if it could just be a rumor. Hypnosifl 21:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PL (DB) Comment

When you can, see Talk:Power level (Dragon Ball)#Okay, let's get these power levels right!, thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to William Schoell

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Thanos6! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 18:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry man

I just went around stealing peoples boxes at random, think of it as a kind a commentary on modern society. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 23:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Sherlock Holmes

I don't have time at the moment to revert some of your changes at Sherlock Holmes, but I recommend that you consult WP:MOS#Quotation marks with regard to the use of quotation marks with other punctuation. Deor 02:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's not the way I was taught to do things, either, but it's a style widely used in Britain and Commonwealth coutries (although they use single rather than double quotation marks). Deor 16:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination

I just quick failed Freeza. That is not a GA quality article. See the talk for reasons. TTN 21:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a true fan?

Visit Godzilla wiki. With your help, it will be sweet.

Mr. Mind

after thinking about it.... I'm not sure he did get sent back to the beginning of 52. that part was really confusing.--Marhawkman 21:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dvd teentr ep274 scrn35.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dvd teentr ep274 scrn35.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fun Destroyers

Could you please sop being so childish? Comments like "There's no such thing as cruft, but don't bother adding them, the Fun Destroyers will just remove them anyway" are not benifiting in any way to the article. 1.Cruft DOES EXIST, that it doesnt is simply a ingnorant point of view. 2. Calling benificial Wikipedians "Fun Destroyers" is rude,immature and childish. The people you call this are merely following the rules, and Wikipedia encourages that. Please stop. Atomic Religione 16:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Justdont bring it to the talk pages, you are simply ASKING for a fight. Leave your opinions on your user page. Rules are meant to be followed, and changing them is sometime nessecary, but the way you are going about it will get you no where. Atomic Religione 17:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore all rules. Thanos6 has a good, postitive attitude, unlike the naysayers and nitpickers. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania in Atlanta!

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 09:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using a generic template for this. I saw you live in SC but I figured you might like to know about it anyway. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 09:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Database Project

"Even on official policy pages they mention that you should throw up a link to an external fanwiki."

I've never seen that. I've only seen the policy that I provided a link to.

If you want to call an admin, that's completely within your right to do so. I'm not sure calling the Notability guidelines "Godawful" is particularly helpful in that regard. The usual first steps are to do a Request for Comment and Mediation. You want to that route, I'm perfectly agreeable. --Tenebrae 03:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's actually just a list of some places editors can go to in order to find primary and secondary sources — nothing there says to use them as links. In fact, the specific policy at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Examples says, "Wikis, including Wikipedia and other wikis sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation are not regarded as reliable sources. However, wikis are excellent places to locate primary and secondary sources."

As for whether a featured article or a Good Article lists wikis, that's irrelevant — we're not supposed to use examples of non-policy things in other articles to support a non-policy thing in an article in question. As well, articles continue to be edited even after reaching Good Article status, and sometimes non-policy edits and even vandalism can remain undetected for weeks or months. Positions need to be defensible on their own merits.

Please see the lengthy discussion involving other editors and an admin, Steve Block, at User talk:JamieHari.

I'm not sure why you're so adamant about including something against policy, particularly when the link, which other editors have removed as linkspam, was spread through WPC by that site's own creator in a self-promotional fashion to drive traffic to it. --Tenebrae 04:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use uncivil language on my talk page. Thanks. --Tenebrae 04:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Legion Of Doom (Justice).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Legion Of Doom (Justice).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mcelite (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Hope you're watching this guy, his behaviour is much like a sock I've had to deal with, see Peter Vogel and Goku Vogel. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trunks Super Saiyan 2

Look don't put your personal issues inconflict with the article Trunks fully showed Super Saiyan 2 characteristics whether you like it or not. He clearly passed super saiyan when Baby 1st attempted to take control of his body. That picture clearly shows that. Super Saiyan has no energy coming from their body at all only an aura. Thank You

Mcelite 06:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)mcelite[reply]

Wikipedia:User categories for discussion on -isms

Hi. A user category that you are in has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. You are welcome to comment. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Fun Destroyers

The Fun Destroyers are the rot that is slowly eating away at Wikipedia. If something doesn't satisfy their small-minded, tunnelvision version of "notability," then like mindless, shrieking harpies, they fall upon it with cries of "cruft" and "trivia" and "non-notable" and get it deleted, sucking much enjoyment out of Wikipedia for everyone else. Well, no more, I say. We must stand up to the Fun Destroyers and keep this site worth coming to!

I can see both sides of this argument. On the one hand I side with you, thinking that Wikipedia is created by the users and should reflect what the users are interested in. But there's another part of me that agrees with the Fun Destroyers, that achieving five minutes (not even fifteen) of notoriety for appearing in the funny YouTube video du jour doesn't necessarily mean that you deserve an encyclopedia article devoted to you. I think it has to be case-by-case. -- PurpleChez (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS...I didn't mean to intrude upon your user page, but it seems as if you don't have a discussion page working...or maybe it's my browser (which has happened).... -- PurpleChez (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Claus

I enjoyed your addition to "my" Santa Claus article, pointing out that, by the end of the film, Santa still hasn't left Mexico City. One of the many, many things that I've always thought was so amusing about that movie was that its Santa Claus is perhaps the slowest Saint Nick ever. Some Santa stories talk about the magic involved in Santa being able to deliver all those presents in one night...Mexican Santa Claus would be hard-pressed to deliver presents to a single trailer park in one night. I also enjoy the fact that Lupita's dad goes job hunting in the pre-dawn hours of Christmas morning, that it's snowing inside Santa's extraterrestrial sweat shop, and that Pitch plans to (1) finish off Santa forever and (2) make him angry. No, no, Lupita! You mustn't steal! You'll be sorry! -- PurpleChez (talk) 17:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MeleeSMImap.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MeleeSMImap.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CountingPine (talk) 00:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Monster Society Of Evil.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Monster Society Of Evil.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Greb (talk) 00:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magneto's name

Thanos, Myst here. There is no indication in any of the Official Handbooks that "Erik Lehnsherr" is Magneto's real name. I have every recent issue of the Handbook. To what are you referring?Myst3 (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could I get your help here?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Earthlings_in_Dragon_Ball#Merge ... They are trying to merge DB human characters. Will you help me put an end to that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SSJ 5 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx man ;) SSJ 5 (talk) 13:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your personal attack here

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Maelstrom-profile.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Maelstrom-profile.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Monkey-SMImap.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Monkey-SMImap.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Volapük

Hi Thanos6! I found your name on the page of a member of the m:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians and thought that you might want to help us with fighting this proposal: m:Proposals for closing projects/Radical cleanup of Volapük Wikipedia. If you agree that this delete-all-stubs proposal is not the best way to go for the Volapük Wikipedia, you can help us fight it with your vote. Thanks in advance! --Smeira 22:23, 5 jan 2008.

The Centrality

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Centrality, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Centrality. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SkullIsland-overview.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SkullIsland-overview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Walsh

I'm curious as to what you are expecting to find for the character, because he's fairly non-notable in the series itself. The film was criticized for having homosexual undertones, but anything that is remarked about the character himself can easily be said on the film page (if it isn't already). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But being mentioned in spin-off books isn't considered "significant coverage in third party sources". It's just more plot sources. I think Nightmare needs a "List of characters in A Nightmare on Elm Street page, similar to List of characters in Friday the 13th--as just about everyone from the films have almost no real notability, but have appeared in various mediums of the series (thus, mentioning a comic book that isn't directly about the film the character started in might not be relevant on the film page, but is relevant on a list of characters page). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTE--"A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." That means, being mentioned in a comic books does not make one notable enough for an entire article devoted to it on Wikipedia. That also means that just because you reject the notability guideline that you don't have to follow it. It may be a guideline, but unless you can show that Jesse Walsh is an exception to the rule then WP:IAR doesn't apply. Also, making the bare minimum requirements of notability doesn't mean the topic deserves an article either, because if there isn't enough real world content to support the page it may just be better served on a page that covers are larger scope of the subject. So, in your search of those spin-offs you find secondary sources "independent of the subject". That means, him being mentioned in a book about A Nightmare on Elm Street wouldn't constitute "independent of the subject". You asked for "a couple of days" (which is 2), and you can have 3 days to find your sources before I simply AfD or put a merge proposal up on the article (probably the latter). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 02:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, until the notability guideline is done away with, you still have to follow it. If you choose to ignore it simply because you disagree with it, that's your perogative. No one can make you do anything you don't choose to do, that's why life is so wonderful. ;) BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brethren Court

The page has been nominated for deletion, please join the discussion here. Therequiembellishere (talk) 10:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for recognizing me on your wall of fame. I'm not one to bask in the spotlight, but I occassionally enjoy a bit of recognition for hard work. We wouldn't want to tarnish our reputation by spitting out pages for any ol' thing, now would we? I appreciate the sentiment, and you can be rest assured that I will continue to fight for Wikipedia's best interests by ensuring that every article that I come across meets Wiki's high standards for existence. Have a good night, and happy editing. ;) BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can leave me on or take me off it doesn't really matter (as you said I have a sense of humor, so it really doesn't bother me). If you look at my user page you'll see I've been called similar things by other people. Everyone's always after the same goals (except vandals), we just all choose different paths to attain those goals. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason

I'm not aware of him every speaking in Jason Goes to Hell, what scene are you refering to? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 06:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't Jason though...it was his spirit in the body, but not him physically talking through his own body. That is what the statement is about. On a side note, that whole segment of that film seemed out of place with the rest of it. Why did he not speak in any other body for the entire film, yet when he jumped into the officer's body he all of a sudden begins talking perfectly. That was just weird. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 06:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not if you physically couldn't talk in one body. He's never shown to speak in adult form, just grunt and moan (and that ended after Part 4). But we can reword it so that it's clear that it isn't the Jason that people would normally invision actually doing the speaking. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 06:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Occassionally, Lex Luthor and Superman have to work together to fight a greater evil. ;) BIGNOLE (Contact me) 06:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tien

Hi :D Can I count you in for fixing some DB humans articles? Sesshomaru and I and trying to make them all good article candidates. SSJ 5 (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dvd teentr ep274 scrn35.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dvd teentr ep274 scrn35.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dvd teentr ep274 scrn35.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dvd teentr ep274 scrn35.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MonsterSocietyOfEvil1st.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MonsterSocietyOfEvil1st.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dinky Map.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dinky Map.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny

Hi Thanos6,

I noticed you reverted my edit to the article linked above, and I was wondering if you wouldn't mind explaining why. Although the AfD clearly didn't come to the conclusion that I thought it would, a number of commentators agreed that the "cruft"--that is, the section I deleted--needed to go. Since our job as an encyclopedia is to provide an overview of the subject rather than an indiscriminate collection of information, I was hoping that you could explain (either here or on the article talk page) why you feel the inclusion of this section is vital to the article. Thanks! --jonny-m t 02:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment on my page, well, 1) I don't believe there is such a thing as cruft, and 2) if there is, this isn't it. I have absolutely no interest in the USoUD, and have no desire to listen to the song or watch the video, but if I'm ever curious as to what icons of pop culture made it in, and how they were removed, I want that list there. I don't see anything wrong with a list like that. Thanos6 (talk) 04:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the question you have to ask is not so much why it shouldn't be removed but why it should be included. For example, we could write extensively about the specific painting techniques used by Michelangelo, but such a long discussion of his brushstrokes would be out of place in his general biography. In this case, we also have to look at the question of undue weight--that it, does the inclusion of this extensive list place an undue focus on the specific content of the video rather than its overall notability as web-based content. I'm of the strong opinion that it does, which means that the inclusion of this list violates Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view.

In addition, the inclusion of this content serves as a guide to the video, which is contrary to Wikipedia's nature as an encyclopedia. And finally, although there was never a formal discussion on its removal, the deletion discussion linked above carried with it a strong suggestion that the excess content in the article be removed, which you can argue constitutes a level of consensus on the matter. --jonny-m t 05:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just as we have had AFDs before, this matter has been discussed extensively at the article and that is the proper place to continue this discussion. I am reverting the deletion of this material as it has long been part of the article and is quite informative. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanos6's selfless action of defending content in which he had no personal interest is commendable. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Island merges

Hi there, I had the impression the changes would not be controversial, but I was clearly wrong, sorry.

I've tried to explain my decisions a little bit on Talk:Monkey Island (fictional world), and I personally think the page gives a much more coherent view of Monkey Island's fiction as a whole, where it was previously pretty fragmented. But I'm repeating myself :). If you choose to revert, give us a shout and I will help to undo some of the link changes, updates to fair use rationale, etc -- Playclever (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, the above page was moved to Talk:World of Monkey Island. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ZeroGiga

What is this editor doing? I don't understand why (s)he is merging the pages without a reason. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion/merging of DBZ characters is going on by stealth. I've gone to deletion review to ask about the legitimacy of the decisions. Feel free to come too here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_September_27

Collectonian and Lord S are AfD'ing an article from DBZ again

They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan JJJ999 (talk) 07:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks on your user page

To make it pretty simple, your entire user page is a giant personal attack, and although I'm inclined to delete it per CSD G10, I will give you the opportunity to clear your user page of all personal attacks. You are welcome to your views on notability, but disparaging other editors is not acceptable in any circumstances. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 07:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You find that your views are better expressed when they do not appear vitriolic or condescending. Calling administrators and editors who believe strongly in the notability guideline "fun-destroyers" and comparing them to the people who burned the Library of Alexandria is to be absolutely frank, disgusting and immature. Again, you are entitled to your views on notability. You can place on your user page that you don't agree with the notability policy, and you appear to be one of the editors that believes that verifiability is all that is needed. That is fine, although you should express it in a civil manner. Your personal attacks on administrators (this is very mature) and other editors all needs to be removed. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 22:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much better. I appreciate your cooperation in this manner. Regards, — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 03:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

A Nobody^{My talk} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy Saint Patrick’s Day!

On behalf of the Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign, we just want to spread Wikipedia:WikiLove by wishing you a Happy Saint Patrick’s Day! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter!

On behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 06:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:8 Eyes Layout.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:8 Eyes Layout.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Bastille Day!

Dear fellow Wikipedian, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Labor Day!

Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A Nobody^{My talk} 02:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Status

Hello! You have not edited in almost a year. Anyway, just checking in if everything is okay? Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 02:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!

File:Halloween Hush Puppies.jpg

Photograph of my Halloween-themed Hush Puppies plush basset hounds in my bedroom.

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 23:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving!

I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Eco-Villains.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Eco-Villains.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cliff Hangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:WallpaperWMI1-01 1280x1024.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WallpaperWMI1-01 1280x1024.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Red Reamer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Red Reamer. Since you had some involvement with the Red Reamer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eco-Villains.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eco-Villains.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thanos6. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mister Mind's Imago.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mister Mind's Imago.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Worlds Finest 264-51.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Worlds Finest 264-51.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Worlds Finest 264-51.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Worlds Finest 264-51.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eco-Villains United.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eco-Villains United.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]