Jump to content

Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club/Members

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following Wikipedians are volunteer members of the Harmonious Editing Club. If you would like to join, include your name in the alphabetical list after agreeing to this (short) list of guidelines:


Userboxes

[edit]

In order to flaunt your membership and to promote our project users have created userboxes which may be placed on your userpage:

Harmonious Editing ClubThis user is proud to be a member of the Harmonious Editing Club.

= {{User HEC}} created by Fig

HECThis user is a member of the Harmonious Editing Club.

= {{User:Daduzi/HEC}} created by Daduzi

Wikipedia:Harmonious editing clubHarmonious Editing Club
Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club
 This user is a member of the Harmonious Editing Club.

= {{User:Netmonger/HEC}} created by Netmonger

Harmonious Editing Club
This user is proud to be a member of the Harmonious Editing Club.

= {{User HEC 2}} created by Glove

Members

[edit]
  1. 1Bookfan Talk
  2. A D Monroe III talk Really, it's the only way to be constructive.
  3. A Sprig of Fig & a lock of holly 17:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC) In the most sincere manner[reply]
  4. A the wikier from zh wikipedia
  5. AD64
  6. Abridged -- I like this idea. Abridged 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Addesso Wow, talking as a form of constructively and peacefully solving disputes. That is so . . . out-of-the-box, radical thinking! I'm in!
  8. Alarob (Rob C)
  9. Alex756 (glad to see there are voluntary associations forming on Wikipedia)
  10. Alexanderlime -- Count me! Alexanderlime (talk) 10:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Algotr
  12. Alx-pl D
  13. Alex Plank
  14. Ambush Commander(Talk)
  15. Aminullah
  16. Anchoress per DeathPhoenix :-))
  17. Andrewa
  18. Ardent †∈]] =D Diplomats unite! Harmony can thrive with a few dedicated people. Make the Wiki a better place!
  19. Arminius - happy to help with disputes
  20. Asbestos - Talk pages should always be used after a revert (except in the case of vandalism or trolls, of course)
  21. Ashibaka talk
  22. AvB
  23. Balablitz 23:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bardofcornish 00:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) sounds like a great way to promote wikilove!![reply]
  25. Ben Aveling
  26. BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC) I shall strive to live up to this in all my future edits. --BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Benc
  28. Beth Wellington 23:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Sounds good to me.[reply]
  29. Bogdan
  30. BradMajors
  31. Brrk.3001 06:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Im in![reply]
  32. Buddhipriya 03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Bunty.Gill newbie@harmonious edits club
  34. CaroleHenson - so glad to have learned about this group!
  35. CaseyPenk - much appreciated! CaseyPenk (talk) 01:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Catwhoorg
  37. Chairman S. Talk
  38. Chancemill
  39. Chazz88
  40. Chrisw80 - Good idea.
  41. Chriswaterguy Good principles. Happy to lend a hand if needed.
  42. Cjllw | TALK
  43. ClockworkSoul
  44. Comatose51
  45. Comaze
  46. Coppertwig Anyway, I try to stick to 1RR, and I believe in, you know, harmony and all that.
  47. CP/M
  48. Crypter 23:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC) I'm new but this sounds great[reply]
  49. Cyrillic Great Idea...let's join our hands knights of Wikipedia!
  50. Daduzi
  51. Damian111
  52. Dan100
  53. Davandron
  54. David Spalding Talk/Contribs Bringing Order to chaos can also mean bringing Collaboration to clashing and Consensus to contention
  55. David Strauss
  56. Deathphoenix - I've been doing this anyway, so why not sign up?
  57. Deebkie talk
  58. dewet|✉
  59. DonaldRichardSands - Joined August 9, 2011. Stated principles provide welcome guidance.
  60. Drenched Harmony rocks. Editing rocks too. Harmonious editing rocks especially hard.
  61. Driken
  62. DThomsen8 (talk) 15:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Durova 18:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Denni
  65. Dzonatas
  66. earthsound talk | contribs
  67. Eat me, I'm a red bean (discuss)(contribs) 12:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Ed Poor - on probation for "tendentious editing" (oh, the shame, the shame!)
  69. Electrical Experiment (talk)
  70. Elipongo (Talk contribs) Don't know why I never noticed this club before, I already pretty much follow its guidelines!
  71. Elroch (Talk) I dream of the day that everyone co-operates to arrive at the truth rather than desperately defending their prejudices.
  72. Encephalon | ζ  This is good.
  73. Ethnopunk Do we really have to lose our edits to morons?
  74. Euyyn - per Deathphoenix
  75. Evrenosogullari
  76. Exceedingly Rare (talk) 16:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Faizaguo (talk to me)
  78. Falphin
  79. Fishal
  80. Flammifer - I'm certainly interested in tackling and improving divisive issues !
  81. Flora_b_1
  82. Fredrik - the description above seems to apply to me
  83. Friday - Sounds good to me.
  84. Fridae'sDoom I don't like disputes.
  85. Fuzzform
  86. Gofigure41(talk)
  87. Giovanni33 (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC) I want to join too. Actually, I think this clubs stipulations should be made as policy for all.Giovanni33 (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Glenn Willen
  89. gracefool |☺ 05:29, 5 September 2004 (UTC) - this club needs to grow![reply]
  90. Groove1279 - Because Wikipedia is about "WE" not "ME" ;)
  91. Guido den Broeder
  92. Guy Macon
  93. Harley Herbert Editing is better without arguing!
  94. I dream of horses (T) @
  95. Iirolaiho
  96. Ike9898
  97. ikkyu2 (talk)
  98. Ilyanep If I start to violate the above rules, please stick my ass in a freezer. :D
  99. Ingoolemo
  100. INic I'm only here 'cause I'm an evil, stinking troll in need of redemption
  101. Irmgard 17:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. J-V Heiskanen (as long as the above are going to be the final and only bylaws of this club)
  103. Jasy jatere
  104. JCarriker
  105. Jedi feline This sounds like a good idea, especially for music pages where there are genre disputes that could easily be resolved but aren't.
  106. Jehochman 15 August 2006
  107. Jet123
  108. JFW | T@lk
  109. JiMoThYTALK
  110. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC) [I agree with the current aims and endeavor to follow them (which I think I generally have done in past edits). I was going to join a year back; no idea why I didn't.)[reply]
  111. John196920022001 An early experience on Wikipedia involved an edit war with an uncivil editor. Before I knew any better I contributed to that edit war. In researching incivility I found this club
  112. John Pritchard - that's what this is, wikipedia, isn't it? whew.
  113. Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit"
  114. Jondel 06:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC) - I heard this club is strictly restricted to good looking people only?  :)[reply]
  115. Joshua — worth a try
  116. Jossi≈ t • @
  117. Junkie007 (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Kaal
  119. Kawaputra
  120. Keesiewonder talk -- I have trouble w/not reverting what I perceive as vandalism multiple times though ...
  121. Kevthegreat55 I'll do my best
  122. Kodama will try to be friendly...
  123. Kotare 07:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC) What a great concept, the guidelines of this club are well thought out and intelligent and if followed will tremendously reduce the amount of unproductive conflict on wikipedia.[reply]
  124. KrakatoaKatie and harmony are pretty good company...
  125. Laleena
  126. L'Aquatique I already subscribe to this mindset I might as well get the badge, right?
  127. LaNaranja
  128. Lihaas
  129. Lisapollison I also self-designate as a trial member, & aspire to full membership
  130. Lolinder Though I'm more often the oak than the willow, I'll strive to reverse my role.
  131. Loolylolly1997 5:25, 30 November 2007
  132. Lotje (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Lquilter self-designates as a trial member, & aspires to full membership
  134. Ludraman
  135. Luksuh 01:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Mac_Davis (talk · contribs) always wanted to be a prime number.
  137. Manscher
  138. Mark ✎
  139. User:Markworthen
  140. Marshman (I think I have passed through the early un-harmonious stage relatively unscathed)
  141. Matt Crypto 10:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  142. User:Mach2motocross
  143. Mbbradford -- Don't worry, this is not Esperanza
  144. Meelar
  145. Meristat 22:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  146. MONGO I need harmonizing...
  147. Monica Bremo 2:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Drink mint tea!
  148. Mooncrest
  149. Mr. Stradivarius
  150. Mtheletter
  151. Nadav (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Neigel von Teighen ready to put some harmony!
  153. Neutrality what Ruhrjung said.
  154. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 11:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Love to give it a shot..[reply]
  155. Nightstallion ナイトスタリオン ㇳ–ㇰ — — I'm in.
  156. NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 20:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Nobs
  158. Ombudsman
  159. Omphaloscope — ready to sing my part
  160. Paleorthid What Saxifrage said.
  161. Paul venter Harmonious editing sounds like an oxymoron, but let's show good faith!
  162. Pavithran|Talk - Good initiative! Keep it up guys!
  163. Pedant A lot of articles, I don't even edit, just add to the discussion what seems good or bad about it. I'll help on anything.
  164. Perl
  165. User:Philbuck222 01:19, 31 October 2007
  166. PhilKnight (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Pinkadelica (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:prof_tpms Let us make Wikipedia more fun to be with
  169. Pufferfish101
  170. Rafaelsfingers
  171. Randy
  172. Ravn, Strong support. ;)
  173. Rdsmith4 - Oh, why not. Is there a Category:Lost causes?
  174. Revived
  175. Richard Spread harmonious editing, join the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal!
  176. Rickyrab
  177. Royblumy
  178. Ruhrjung has been with you in the heart all the time (the deeds might be another matter)
  179. Rui Gabriel Correia Someone doesn't agree with you? Leave it. Someone else will disagree with them later and change it.
  180. Ruthfulbarbarity 03:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Rursus 100% agreed by prev speaker.
  182. Rycr 11:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Sasawat
  184. Saxifrage Because the willow survives the storm that fells the oak.
  185. Schmiteye
  186. Seth Mahoney Yay! for harmony!
  187. SFrahm What a concept!
  188. Shack★Talk，I like it. And actually Harmonious editing was the purpose of Wikipedia, who like seeing Wikipedia quarrel endlessly? 08:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Shannon
  190. Shenhemu
  191. Shirahadasha 03:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC) What a great club![reply]
  192. Shrigley
  193. Shruti14 Great idea!!
  194. Simon 19:33, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
  195. Sir james paul 12:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  196. User:Sir Richardson Proud to call myself a member.
  197. SlimVirgin I think the decision to self-limit on reverting is a good idea.
  198. Sm8900 . I think this club is one of the best idea that I have ever seen. I would like to helpo out if possible, with creating new resources, ideas, efforts, etc, if possible. thanks! ---Sm8900 (talk) 🌍 14:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  199. SmokeyJoe "Wikipedia is not here to make people sad. So we want to respond in a helpful and loving way." 21:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Smyth
  201. Sobar I never knew this club existed. I think this is great.
  202. Spalding
  203. Stephen B Streater while noting that agreement does not require compromise
  204. Stevertigo
  205. Strawberry Sara
  206. Subramanian talk -- Ahimsa, everyone!
  207. Jake Supeyman 22:15, 28 April 2008
  208. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ]
  209. Superm401 | Talk
  210. T-dot ( talk contribs )
  211. TAS
  212. Tatteredpaper | (talk)
  213. The Founders Intent Just say, "Ummmmmmmmm...."
  214. The Placebo Effect
  215. The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake
  216. TheronJ Good idea
  217. TicketMan - Talk - contribs
  218. Timbo
  219. Toby Bartels
  220. Tony Sidaway
  221. T.PK Ready for some harmonizing!
  222. Tr1290 16:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Trade2tradewell If you want to improve your POV , be ready to listen to the other
  224. Trubadurix Sounds good
  225. Tuf-Kat
  226. Tumadoireacht
  227. Umofomia
  228. unomi The way it should be.
  229. Utcursch
  230. Visctrix
  231. WikiLen — learning how to have 1 revert work
  232. WikiprojectOWU
  233. WikiUser
  234. Wing Nut
  235. Wirelain∞ - We have cousins over at WP:CCD.
  236. WooyiTalk, Editor review 01:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Xinit
  238. Xiong Chiamiov
  239. Xuxalliope (talk · contribs)
  240. Yintaɳ 
  241. Zappaz A tall order for a person with my character, but worth striving for!
  242. Ze miguel
  243. Zero
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Harmonious_editing_club/Members&oldid=1224240112"