Talk:Project Rastko

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Some copyrighted text from the site of the project used with permission. Nikola 11:17 11 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Copyright

Work of croatian writer Ivan Goran Kovačić which is copyright protected (it is published in 1944) is on internet site of Projekt Rastko with comments we have taken this from other site [1] and without of permission of copyright owners !! --Rjecina 16:37 21 November 2007 (UTC)

How do you know it's not with permission of the original copyright owners? // laughing man 18:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That work is not in copyright in countries with life+50 copyright laws, which Project Rastko targets.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bn matica e.gif

Image:Bn matica e.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 18:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Project Rastko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080629091858/http://www.rastko.net/rastko-ka/ to http://www.rastko.net/rastko-ka/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025043903/http://dp.rastko.net/ to http://dp.rastko.net/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101018012119/http://rastko.users.t-com.me/ to http://rastko.users.t-com.me/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]