Talk:List of historical monkeys
I feel this page should be made a redirect to List of historical chimpanzees. There is nothing at all of real substance in this page. List of fictional monkeys and List of historical animals are 'See also's. List of historical apes has the monkeys excluded from it. And the only remaining entry is the one for chimpanzees. Jay 20:58, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- I agree that this page is pretty pointless as it is, just an empty template. But the answer to that is to add content, not to give up on it: surely somebody can think of at least one famous monkey?
In any case, I strongly disagree with the suggestion that this page be redirected to [[List of historical chimpanzees]], for the simple reason that monkeys are not chimpanzees and vice versa. —Paul A 08:13, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- There, see? I found two historic monkeys, as well as another famous monkey of dubious historic-ness. And it wasn't even that hard. —Paul A 08:54, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)
I plan to remove the word "historical" from the article name. See Talk:List_of_historical_animals for further discussion. Jay 08:39, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the List of historical monkeys page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "List of historical monkeys" page.
