Talk:Indian Placement Program

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian Placement Program article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about personal beliefs, nor for Apologetic/Polemic debates. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about personal beliefs, nor for Apologetic/Polemic debates at the Reference desk.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Harold B. Lee Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk · contribs) has been paid by BYU. Their editing has included contributions to this article. COI declarations on userpage
Amgisseman(BYU) (talk · contribs) has been paid by BYU. Their editing has included contributions to this article. COI declarations on userpage

Untitled

is there a list of names who all went on the program, looking for a friend

Nothing about the sex abuse claims?

Several lawsuits are now ongoing regarding sexual abuse of children in the program, particularly from the Navajo Nation. For example, http://fox13now.com/2016/03/24/lds-church-named-in-lawsuit-alleging-sexual-abuse-of-navajo-children-in-foster-program/ reports on a recent case. 208.163.133.252 (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new section on it today. Mang (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dates are too broad

It says "1947-2000." We all know this program didn't have legs until the 60s and lost its legs in the 70s. Yes, there was an informal program with ONE student in 1947, and it sounds like Spencer W Kimball, in keeping with his penchant for all things Native American, was already keeping an eye on that one student, but it didn't become a program until 1954. The program eventually peaked in '72 with ~5000 students, then began its decline because of both nativist political pressure and the increasing quality of reservation schools. Ironically, it may have been the US government's investigation and subsequent blessing in 1977 that made it socially unpopular and sealed its fate. All I'm saying is that it was a real bell curve, and casually saying it was a thing when it was 3 deviations above or below its mean is a little generous. That's like saying the abacus was in use from 6,000 BC to 2016. I mean, I guess so. But more appropriate than the current wording would be a line like "Although the program became official in 1954 and some students remained even up until the mid 1990s, the vast bulk of students participating were in the 1960s and 70s." Thoughts? --Mrcolj (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scribd references

I removed content that was only supported by Scribd, as that may be an unreliable source and contain copyright violations (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 51#Scribdlinks.) If an editor wants to readd the content, please use a reliable source. Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]