User talk:Marine 69-71/Archive1

Note: This an archive only. To talk to me go to Talk

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Marine 69-71. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Nomination

Dad, I nominated you for administrator here.

Love you!

Antonio Careless, Ruleless, Lawless Martin

Barnstar

Dad, I forgot its protocol to tell anyone when they have been given a Barnstar award, so here is your message.

Thanks and God bless..love you!

Your son,Antonio El Lobo Mayor Martin

==Adminship==

I have removed your nomination for adminship because many in the community feel it is too early. Once you have 2 or 3 more months and a 1000 more edits, I think the community would vote for you as an administator. Best regards --H. CHENEY 01:46, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Accents on Puerto Rican names

Marine, you seem to be terminating – with the most extreme prejudice – all the accents on the names of Puerto Rican people: Tomás Batista, Manuel Fernández, Eugenio María... May I ask why? –Hajor 04:18, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the explanation. I'm pretty sure that's against policy (ask Antonio?), but you might just get away with it if no one's watching. –Hajor 13:39, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Joaquin Phoenix

Tony, I understand that this whole thing started with an honest mistake as to whether or not there already existed an article on Joaquin Phoenix (due to the accent over the "i", I presume), but please make your edits to the existing Joaquin Phoenix article. It's ridiculous to suggest that Rick keeps "his" version of the article at Joaquin Phoenix and you work on "your" version at Joaquin Phoenix (Actor), for readers to choose between them. That's simply not the way Wikipedia works. —Stormie 01:57, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)

I have merged all the biographical info from your article into Joaquin Phoenix - please, have a look (I hope you'll be happy with it), and carry on editing there. —Stormie 03:03, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)

Hi Tony, glad you like it. I like to think of myself as a calming influence. :-) But for the future, you gotta talk to people if they're reverting your edits and posting messages to your talk page.. it's the only way to avoid a revert war! Cheers! —Stormie 04:24, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)

How you doing Stormie

Hi Tony, thanks for your kind words! I actually didn't realise that you hadn't finished writing Maria Elena Holly - I saw it on the new pages list, had a look at it, noticed a typo or two and jumped in to fix them. I'm a pretty avid watcher of Special:Newpages, I tend to at least glance at anything that gets created when I'm online and Wikipedia'ing.

Chita Rivera on being a legend

Hi Tony. Remember that the people giving you advice about NPOV may not know the topic of the article in each case. To my mind it is very common to describe Rivera as a legend, so to attribute to a single quote "XYZ magazine says she is a legend" would be to undersell her. And that is POV too! You should write something like

"Rivera is widely regarded by theatre aficiandos as a "living legend". Indeed InTheare magazine as suggested in an interview: " You must be tired of the term "legend", but let's get it out of the way. You have long been considered a Broadway legend."" Rivera replied "Oh, God!" and laughed. [Quoted at http://www.geocities.com/Broadway/Stage/9942/inthe1226.html]

Pcb21| Pete 00:17, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Accents in titles

Marine, please take a look around at the other articles about people with non-English names in the Wikipedia: the main articles are invariably located at (eg) François Mitterrand, Horst Köhler, Óscar Romero. Of course, they've all got redirects from the unaccented forms: Francois Mitterrand, Horst Kohler, Oscar Romero, etc. So, if those "English-speakers who don't understand the concept of accents" (ouch! bit patronising, that...) type in Agustin Stahl in the search box, they get taken, by the appropriate redirect, to Agustín Stahl. Please try this out and see how it works; surely Tomás Batista can put up with the same treatment as Pierre Bérégovoy? –Hajor 23:17, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Quoting you back at you:

where in the bylaws of Wikipedia does it state that my titles "MUST" have an accent?

Now that's what they call a damn fine question. I wonder if it does, anywhere... custom is certainly to put them on, but maybe you're right, maybe it isn't set in stone anywhere. I'm sure there are several Wiki-stalwarts furiously searching even as we speak and, if they don't find anything, steps will be taken to make it policy asap.

However, one more comment: while you're right that you can buy books about PR (and about Mexico and anywhere else in Latin America) that don't use accents on the names, take a look inside some serious history books. Some encyclopedias. I've just opened up my Encyclopaedia Britannica, and I can assure you it's talking about "Muñoz Marín" and "Hernández Colón". Un saludo desde tierra azteca, –Hajor 00:10, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Saludos de JorgeGG

Saludos Marine 69-71, recibi tu mensaje. Cuando puedas inscribete (sino no lo has hecho todavía) en la Wikipedia en español y esperando que colabores. --Jorge GG 23:08, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Ribas-Dominicci

Hi, Tony. Thanks for the note you left, and the kind words in it. I'll head on over to Fernando L. Ribas-Dominicci and see if there's anything I can do to make matters clearer. Cheers, –Hajor 14:45, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Glad you approve of what I did to Capt. R-D. Hopefully, the user who placed the POV flag on it will see the changes -- otherwise, I suppose you could drop him a line and ask him to take a look. If there's anything he still objects to, he should probably have a go at fixing it himself or (at the very least) identifying the disputed sections on Talk.
Re the Cardinal: apparently, putting the name that way is the correct approach ("correct" in the sense of what the Style Manual asks us to do) -- see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles), scrolling down to "Clerical Names". There's an explanation there, too. Cool? –Hajor 00:41, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

List of famous Puerto Ricans and Category:Puerto Rican people

Hello Tony! First of all, thanks for all your magnificient contributions to the pedia.

I'm a little worried about your inclusion of List of famous Puerto Ricans to every article about a Puerto Rican. You see, back in the days when we didn't have Categories, we used lists to navigate between articles. However, now that we have them, we use the categories rather than the lists. In other words, there is no need to include the list on every article, or better said, there is no need to include the list on any article afterall. Use the categories instead. The article is great, but the categories are much better for its purpose.

About Category:Puerto Rico and Category:Puerto Rican people: if you are listing a person under the category, check first which categories are its parents. For example, listing Don Cholito under both Category:Puerto Rican people and Category:Puerto Rican comedians is unneccessary because Category:Puerto Rican people is a parent of Category:Puerto Rican comedians. That is, Category:Puerto Rican comedians falls under Puerto Rican people. That is what we call nesting. Check Category:Universities and colleges for a fine example. Imagine the mess that we would create if we list every topic related to Puerto Rico under Category:Puerto Rico. That is why the different sub-categories were created for, to avoid this.

Again, thanks for your work!

—John | Talk 22:03, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)

Marine 69-71:
Couldn't the "Category: Puerto Rican people" be renamed to something like "Category:Puerto Rican famous people" or something similar. The only reason I ask is because "Puerto Rican people" sounds so "in general" and not specific enough.

The problem with that is that it would create a controversy between who or what is being famous or not. For example, for Puerto Ricans Sandra Zaiter is "famous"... but for the international community she is not. If you want, you can simply create more specific categories under the People's category. Like what you did with Category:Puerto Rican sportspeople and Category:Puerto Rican comedians... heck you can even create Category:Puerto Rican basketball players under Category:Puerto Rican sportspeople if you want. =) We avoid using the "famous" adjective when describing someone. For example, List of Navy-Vieques protesters and supporters was originally List of famous Navy-Vieques protesters and supporters.

At your service,

—John | Talk 17:37, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)

Peace Offering

I accept. Rick K 04:05, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)

Bernie Williams

The reason I moved the Bernie Williams article to "Bernie Williams (born 1968)" is that eventually there will have to be a "Bernie Williams (born 1948)" article, and it's necessary to disambiguate them. Yes, I'm a Yankee fan, born early enough that I remember when the Yankee centerfielder was a fellow named DiMaggio! (Though he retired the year after I got interested in baseball, leaving centerfield to another pretty good fellow named Mantle!) -- BRG 17:45, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)

Since they're both baseball players, I guess the date is the best way to disambiguate them. Rick K 04:28, Aug 24, 2004 (UTC)

Ruben Gomez Colon

Hiya.. sure, I'll give it a go. What name do you think the article should be under, though? Not being American and not known anything about baseball, I've never heard of the guy, so I don't know what name he's most commonly known by. And should there be accents in his name or not? i.e. should it be Ruben Gomez Colon or Rubén Gómez Colón? —Stormie 03:40, Aug 30, 2004 (UTC)

Alert, alert. There's already an article at Rubén Gómez. I know nothing about baseball either, but it sounds like the same guy. –Hajor 03:58, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Ah. I see you knew that already and were in the process of fixing it. I'm not sure whether he should go at "Rubén Gómez" or Rubén Gómez Colón" but, yeah, wherever he ends up, we need to be more generous in creating redirect pages, particularly for esos latinos locos with two or more surnames and funny accented characters in their names. Suerte, –Hajor 15:57, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your plan (article at Rubén Gómez, with full name in the first line) sounds excellent to me. Go for it! Cheers, –Hajor 20:59, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi! The merge is done - have a look at Rubén Gómez and see what you think! Alternative combinations of names and accents are redirects to there. —Stormie 01:37, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)

Happy to help, Tony! p.s. I want to say, it's great to have you here really focusing in on a particular field such as Puerto Rico. I think of myself as a generalist, I do a bit here and a bit there, which is great, but without specialists like yourself, the Wikipedia would be a far, far poorer place. Thanks! —Stormie 02:45, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)

Juan "Chi-Chi" Rodriguez

Hi, Tony. I can see the problem that article's causing on Category:Puerto Rican people and Category:Golfers but -- most curiously -- not on Category:Puerto Rican sportspeople. You've got me scratching my head with this one, pal. I have no idea what's going on. Maybe it's a known bug; maybe it's something that will settle down and cure itself in a day or two. I'm sorry, and I'm glad you asked, but I have no idea why that should happen. Not much help, I'm afraid. –Hajor 04:12, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I saw something like this once before, when browsing the list of new pages. That also involved an article with " in the name. I couldn't figure it out then and I can't figure it out now. :-) But, I do seem to recall, that the problem went away later. Have you tried asking on Wikipedia:Help Desk? —Stormie 06:19, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)

AOL vandalbots and blocks

Hi; I'm sorry about that. There really isn't a way to avoid it currently, because for some reason logged-in AOL users such as yourself are affected by IP blocks. That's why I set it for only two hours; long enough to stop the bot (for the meantime) but hopefully short enough not to disrupt too many users. So unless you were to switch ISPs (to one that does not use proxies), the occasional block is something you'll have to endure. :(

To answer your second question; essentially, a vandalbot is (usually) an automated script that makes malicious edits to random articles at a high rate. For an in-depth explanation, see m:Vandalbot. Regards, -- Hadal 02:13, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

About Rubén Gómez

Hello Marine.

Thanks for your message.

My main hobbies are read (a lot) and I have a special interest in all music (specially jazz), classic cinema, and baseball.

About Rubén Gómez, it's O.K. Again, I have cleaned up reiterated testimonies and added alphabetical order for categories. So, before writing an article, I would like to suggest you to take a look at Manual of Style and How to write a great article, in order to avoid double links or unnecessary redudancies. Sometimes "less is more". Ah, y si deseas, puedes escribirme en español. Me gusta más la lengua de Cervantes. Sincerely, MusiCitizen 18:24, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)

Modesto Cartagena vandalism

Hi Tony! Seems that the vandal had given up by the time I saw your message.. but since this is not the first time he's hit that article, he may well be back - I have added it to my watchlist, if he messes with it again, instant block, he's had enough warnings. —Stormie 01:33, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

User page vandalism

Hi Tony! Unfortunately, that IP address that vandalised your talk page (and the nearby but not identical IP that vandalised your user page, I just rolled that back) is an AOL proxy server. I'm a little hesitant to block it due to the potential of innocent editors also being blocked just because they use AOL and hit the same proxy. Seems that every time someone blocks an AOL proxy it gets unblocked anyway, and there's whining and complaining on the mailing list. :-(

If he keeps it up, though, I'll give the address a 24 hour block and damn the torpedoes! —Stormie 23:51, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

Re: Grito de Lares

Hi Tony, hope you are doing well. Sure, I have no problem of moving it to Grito de Lares. I moved it back because you moved it manually and when you do so, we lose the article's history (the edit history). When things like that happen again, you have to ask for the moving point to be deleted. In this case, ask for Grito de Lares to be deleted. Then, once it is deleted, go to Lares Cry and click on the "move" link at the top of the article and just follow instructions in order to move that whole article to Grito de Lares. If you need help let me know. —Joseph | Talk 03:30, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)

Nevermind, I just noticed that you moved it to Grito de Lares (Lares Cry) which is an excellent idea. *clap* —Joseph | Talk 03:31, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)

Ruben Gomez

Thanks, I appreciate the text cleanup and wikification. The article probably still needs some headings, but you've definitely improved it. Thanks again for taking the time to look at it. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 13:13, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)

Joseph M. Acaba

You're welcome. You probably had problems moving it because I beat you to it and the new article title was already there. Rick K 08:01, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)

You're welcome, again. :) Rick K 18:58, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)

Luisa Capetillo

While patrolling New Pages, I came across Luisa Capetillo, which seems to come from [1]. Although that is an anarchist site, I do not see anywhere that they waive their right to copyright. Such a notice may be on their site and I may have missed simply missed it. Normally I would have marked it as copyvio and moved on. Since you are an established user whom I doubt would knowingly violate copyright, I thought I would ask first. Can you verify the copyright ownership of that text? Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 08:45, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Seeing your name attached to the article made me pause and ask first. Umm... you still might want to modify things like that a little bit before submitting them -- just rephrase it in your own words. Copying even short paragraphs verbatim sort of rides the line on copyright. I'm glad to see all the work you're doing on notable Puerto Ricans. That's an area that is under-represented in the Wikipedia. No, I don't work for Southwest (I'll drop Antonio a note so he knows I responded). Well, I'll let you get back to work. Happy editing! SWAdair | Talk 02:57, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Nomination

Hey dad: You have been nominated. You NEED to go here WP:RFA, and STATE , under your nomination, that you ACCEPT the nomination, otherwise no one will vote.

Luv you Dad!

Your son, "Antonio Can you help me find my brain? Martin"

Thank you

Thank you for your very kind words. Actually, there is a core group of people who are very active in checking for copyvios. I'm just one of several. Good luck with your own nomination. Happy editing! SWAdair | Talk 04:33, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Re:Thank You

Hi, Tony. I originally supported you because you seem to be a good, hard-working contributor. Relatively recent disputes (this past summer) that were mentioned in the Oppose column prompted me to move my vote to neutral - but you just need some more time, and possibly someone else to nominate you, and you'll surely get adminship. At least, I will support you sometime in the future.

Your Wikipedian friend, Andre (talk) 17:28, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)

Your Welcome

Hello, Tony. I reason why I voted for you is because you are a really good contributor, and you spend a lot time on wiki. By The way (although not Puerto Rican in decent) I happend to support the Independence movement of Puerto Rico.--[[User:Plato|Comrade Nick @)---^--]] 00:59, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

RfA

Ah, I thought you knew that anyone (admin or not) could vote on RfA. I thought you weren't voting for me for the same reason I'm not voting while my RfA is on-going -- to avoid even the miniscule chance of someone interpreting it as vote swapping (1 Thess. 5:22). Thank you for your vote and your trust. It is much appreciated. SWAdair | Talk 02:48, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your nice note. I've changed my vote - I think Davidcannon summed up what I would've said in his own vote. Ambi 05:52, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Tony! Thank you for your heartwarming note on my talk page, with all your kind words about me and my family. It's a pleasure finding people like you on Wikipedia. Your mini-bios of famous Puerto Ricans are an extremely valuable resource: I know of no other online source of Puerto Rican bios so extensive as found on Wikipedia - thanks to your own hard work. I'm so glad you want to keep it up. BTW, I've read Run Baby, Run! and several other books by Nicky Cruz, and I was so thrilled to see your article about him. There were one or two bits of information that I didn't know, too:-) All the best. David Cannon 12:01, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Your Adminship request

Thanks for your message on my talk page. I think you are a good editor, and so I just wanted you to know that my vote against was purely for the reason listed. I often look at a history page with no tags what-so-ever and I find it hard to get an overview of how the page has evolved. It's a form of communication, much like the talk page. So I'm glad you're making an effort to start tagging your edits, because of it I'm moving my vote to support.

Take care and keep up the good work, and I hope you're successful in your attempt.

PS: Despite what you said in your message, I'm not an admin myself, just someone who tries to contribute. :) Shane King 03:59, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)

Re: Lolita Lebron / Images

Marine 69-71:
Man, you are great!

I know. ^_^

Marine 69-71:
How can I show my appreciation?

By creating more articles that I can edit and add photos to! =)

Marine 69-71:
Could try to get an image of a young Lolita Lebron and add it to my article?

Ask and you shall receive: Lolita Lebron. -_-

Marine 69-71:
Are you a Boricua?

Yup. :)

I hope you are doing well Tony. As always, thanks for your work.

—Joseph | Talk 04:14, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)

I forgot to add, I have noticed that you use the convenience (born _year_ in _place_) for your biographical articles. Although there are no rules for how you write them, the general convenience is to use (born in _year_) is _profession_ from _place_. Just wanted to let ya know. =) I know there is a document wrote somewhere regarding this, it should be either on the Manual of Style or on one of the WikiProjects. —Joseph | Talk 04:25, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)

Deleting revisions from page history

No can do, I'm afraid. The only way of taking an item out of the history would be to delete the lot and replace it with the current version. Unless you're the only author, however, this would breach our commitments under the GFDL. Ambi 01:39, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Translation request

Here's a quick one you might be able to help with. Suellacabras, Soria is only two sentences long. I could translate the first sentence without babelfish, but even with babelfish I couldn't understand the second sentence. Would you be willing to translate this so it doens't have to sit on Pages Needing Translation? Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 11:36, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Vanesa Littlecrow

Hey Tony - I think it's a perfectly good article. Multitalented doesn't strike me as POV, and I don't see anything else to worry about. If you have anything else you'd like a second opinion on, feel free to ask! Andre (talk) 05:41, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)

Looks fine to me too, not sure what the objection could be. Hope the input you've gotten helps! Shane King 08:31, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)

Adminship etc.

Hey there, sorry it took so long to reply to your message, I was on a break from Wikipedia for a while. When you decide to run again by all means let me know, I'll definitely support it. If I haven't contributed for a while the email link is probably the best way to reach me. - Hephaestos|§ 15:36, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Re: Vanesa Littlecrow

I agree it probably is a little rude to rework the article despite the fact several people said it was fine. That said, I think you're right, it's not worth getting into an edit war over, since the reworked version is still OK and an edit war would really serve no purpose. You're far better off just moving on and keeping up the good work in writing articles than getting bogged down with people on talk pages, in my opinion. Anyway, if there's anything else you want my opinion on, feel free to ask, I'm always happy to help out. Shane King 03:41, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

Bureaucratship

Hi Tony - I just wanted to let you know that I'm running for bureaucratship, and I would like to ask for your vote, be it good or bad. I'm sending this message to a few users I respect who have interacted with me recently. Thanks, Andre (talk) 00:29, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the presiding bureaucrat judged it to be too close. Thanks for your support and your kind words, though. I'll be running again soon, and I'll let you know earlier next time! :) Your friend, Andre (talk) 15:22, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks heaps

I appreciate your kind words and support. I've replied a bit further as to my motivations on my talk page. Shane King 23:33, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)

Lolita Lebron

Hi, Tony. I, personally, have never had a problem with the word "terrorist" being used if the definition fits. Words have exact meanings, after all. IMO, "freedom fighters" attempt to gain a tactical or strategical military advantage, while "terrorists" attempt to gain only a psychological advantage through the use of terror. However, I do see a problem with the sentence that you mentioned. The paragraph begins "Lolita has received many honors" and goes on to list honors she has received. The first sentence of the Washington Post article makes it very clear the article is not intended as an honor. That reference does add a lot of detail that is not in our article, and the additional detail probably justifies a link to it. We can't change what the Post named their article, but we can choose how we display the link. I've moved it to an external links section and changed how it is presented. Take a look and let me know what you think. SWAdair | Talk 05:42, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Another translation request

Tony, may I call on you again? Recently I decided that when an anon adds content in Spanish, it might be helpful to point them to the Spanish Wikipedia. I don't speak Spanish well, though. Would you please look at the message I left at User talk:201.243.155.251 and let me know how I could phrase it properly in Spanish? Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 09:47, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)