Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Microbiology,University of Dhaka,Bangladesh
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:02, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tagged on Feb. 27 by Gaurav1146, but not brought here. No vote. Joyous 00:15, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to add {{nonsense}} to this one. Vanity, non-notable. Delete. Alphax τεχ 00:39, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Seems like it could redirect to the university page. Meelar (talk) 00:44, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to the university page, although there is nothing here to merge. RickK 00:46, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Given that we're here already, delete. Title is not good for redirect. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:07, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete There's nothing here, but I note that there are over a dozen departments within MIT that have their own pages. Bovlb 03:13, 2005 Mar 21 (UTC)
- Delete, no useful content, merge all departments into the university page until there's enough material to break something out. Mgm|(talk) 10:52, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Racist? deleting simply because it's in Bangladesh? That's a bit bigoted and hurtful???? Singjo Panraabi 02:09, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Baseless accusations of racism are not helpful and are contrary to the community rules we've established. Please see Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Gamaliel 05:54, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Individual university departments are not notable. Gamaliel 05:54, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Well, some are - certainly if its the first of its kind, or produces an unusual quantity of top contributors to a particular field... but nothing about this particular case suggests that. --BD2412 02:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I should have said generally not notable. Gamaliel 02:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Well, some are - certainly if its the first of its kind, or produces an unusual quantity of top contributors to a particular field... but nothing about this particular case suggests that. --BD2412 02:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- delete Yuckfoo 06:53, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Schoolcrufta delenda est. Edeans 04:30, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.