User talk:Chrisjrn

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 02:22, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

Break the rules again and I'll block you. Consider this your final warning. Also, it is considered poor form to blank your talk page, especially to remove negative things from it. CryptoDerk 06:17, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed that you've started doing some good work. The new articles marked by you meet the CSD criteria. utcursch | talk 09:01, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Some of them still don't. You need to read WP:CSD. Hoangtommy was marked as a CSD, when it should have gone into pages needing translation or WP:CP (though I can't find the source). Echelon (warez) was marked as a CSD despite clearly not meeting guidelines. You could put it on VFD if you want. Additionally, you've started marking things with the {{vfd}} template, but this is bad usage. You should use {{subst:vfd}}, and you actually have to take more steps than that. You've been putting it on pages without actually listing it for deletion. You need to follow ALL the instructions here. You're making some good contributions, but please stick to the guidelines so you don't create more work for others or get yourself or other people in trouble for deleting things that aren't CSDs. CryptoDerk 15:33, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Articles that aren't anything more than weblinks are CSD candidates as well. Don't feel obligated to categorize someone's misuse of the site as something needing work. - Lucky 6.9 09:04, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Dori dori

Please don't delete vfd headers. If you think the article should be moved, vote that way on the linked page. But I didn't put the move to wiktionary header on it to begin with, because it isn't a dictionary definition, it's just the Japanese pronunciaton of an English word. Rick K 10:39, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

×™×¢×§×‘

Hi, what is this ×™×¢×§×‘, and why does it redirect to the Main Page? Just curious. <KF> 11:07, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

I didn't add that. That was accidentally re-added as I added a delete request. Aparrently someone had already done so. :) --Noogz 11:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Khalid Duran

You put a copyvio on the above page. I'm reverting your edit, since SourceWatch is GFDL. ---- Charles Stewart 10:38, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Nomination of Chet Ramey for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Chet Ramey, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chet Ramey until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Noogz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Noogz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Noogz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]