Jump to content

Telescoping series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, a telescoping series is a series whose general term is of the form , i.e. the difference of two consecutive terms of a sequence . As a consequence the partial sums of the series only consists of two terms of after cancellation.[1][2]

The cancellation technique, with part of each term cancelling with part of the next term, is known as the method of differences.

An early statement of the formula for the sum or partial sums of a telescoping series can be found in a 1644 work by Evangelista Torricelli, De dimensione parabolae.[3]

Definition

[edit]
A telescoping series of powers. Note in the summation sign, , the index n goes from 1 to m. There is no relationship between n and m beyond the fact that both are natural numbers.

Telescoping sums are finite sums in which pairs of consecutive terms partly cancel each other, leaving only parts of the initial and final terms.[1][4] Let be the elements of a sequence of numbers. Then If converges to a limit , the telescoping series gives:

Every series is a telescoping series of its own partial sums.[5]

Examples

[edit]
  • The most important and missed one belongs from the property of Squares for those any square of an integer A is the sum of the first A Odds, or:

The proof using the old notation of what is the worgly so called mute index it's very easy since developing the Telescoping Sum we have:

So for example  ;


From where the general formula for any n-th power of an integer A:

This open a breach in the forgotten math fact that any parabola (or polynomial) subtend an area from o and an integer abscissa A that can be squared via integral or via a finite sum since using X instead of i, and representing what we are doing on the cartesian plane will be immediately clear that it is possible to apply an exchange of variable let one write a Sum capable to moves * different from an integer just. So openig the way to calculus:

The new Scaling Rule (holding the same physical Area): From Sum of Integers to Sum of Rationals, then to the Limit

More in general, remembering the new definition for the Sum operator as given into the Abstract, we can first use and push the telescoping Sum properties to the limit (then talk in a modular like concept) to show How to refine a Sum, so working to have at the end not just the same numerical valule, but the same physical Area (in square meter f.ex.) squareing with a finite number or rectangles called Gnomons, the Area Below the 1st Derivative of a Parabola and then show the 4 following identities that are true just for an Upper Limit is . This property will be called invariance for plynomials.

Remembering that:


More in general:


Thanks to the known distributive property for the Sum we can left unchanged the value of the Sum if we multiply all the sum by an unitary (in this case quadratic) factor , reveal us a nice surprise once splitted into the Sum in this way:

then I'll show how to apply the exchange of variable having:

And I hope is now clear why it is used instead of as the New Step (or talking-scaled index) of such sums (as will be proved hereafter).

IF and only IF (IFF) the Upper Limit we can now write the following qadruple equality:

That shows what I will call: the Distribution for Power Terms Law, that works for the n-th power in this way:


where was already presented, and is as follow (Pls see reference for the proof) and show the "External Factor Distributive Law for Powers". so how the scaling, so the exchange of variable, will affect the Terms of the Sum (remembering the result of the sum rest the same):


The first can be easily written remembering the Tartaglia's triangle (so the binomial develop) for for what you have after to eliminate the first term of the develop, alternatively changing the sign from - to +, to have :

etc...

Then a list of new manipulation will reveal a new way to solve Power Problems, and conditions let some equality be possible or not, so True or False (as Fermat The Last for and for all ).


This also leads to 2 new sum properties for sum of polynomials can be shownf.ex. into this equalities... it seems no mathematician want to admit...

or


That onto the Right Hand of Fermat the Last let one write:



so:

And also:

I'm sitting on the river's border waiting for mathematicians define the mute index, and all of you following them...


  • The product of a geometric series with initial term and common ratio by the factor yields a telescoping sum, which allows for a direct calculation of its limit:[6]

when so when

  • The series

is the series of reciprocals of pronic numbers, and it is recognizable as a telescoping series once rewritten in partial fraction form[1]

  • Let k be a positive integer. Then

where Hk is the kth harmonic number.

  • Let k and m with k m be positive integers. Then

where denotes the factorial operation.

which does not converge as

Applications

[edit]

In probability theory, a Poisson process is a stochastic process of which the simplest case involves "occurrences" at random times, the waiting time until the next occurrence having a memoryless exponential distribution, and the number of "occurrences" in any time interval having a Poisson distribution whose expected value is proportional to the length of the time interval. Let Xt be the number of "occurrences" before time t, and let Tx be the waiting time until the xth "occurrence". We seek the probability density function of the random variable Tx. We use the probability mass function for the Poisson distribution, which tells us that

where λ is the average number of occurrences in any time interval of length 1. Observe that the event {Xt ≥ x} is the same as the event {Txt}, and thus they have the same probability. Intuitively, if something occurs at least times before time , we have to wait at most for the occurrence. The density function we seek is therefore

The sum telescopes, leaving

For other applications, see:

[edit]

A telescoping product is a finite product (or the partial product of an infinite product) that can be canceled by the method of quotients to be eventually only a finite number of factors.[7][8] It is the finite products in which consecutive terms cancel denominator with numerator, leaving only the initial and final terms. Let be a sequence of numbers. Then, If converges to 1, the resulting product gives:

For example, the infinite product[7] simplifies as

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Apostol, Tom (1967) [1961]. Calculus, Volume 1 (Second ed.). John Wiley & Sons. pp. 386–387.
  2. ^ Brian S. Thomson and Andrew M. Bruckner, Elementary Real Analysis, Second Edition, CreateSpace, 2008, page 85
  3. ^ Weil, André (1989). "Prehistory of the zeta-function". In Aubert, Karl Egil; Bombieri, Enrico; Goldfeld, Dorian (eds.). Number Theory, Trace Formulas and Discrete Groups: Symposium in Honor of Atle Selberg, Oslo, Norway, July 14–21, 1987. Boston, Massachusetts: Academic Press. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-067570-8.50009-3. MR 0993308.
  4. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Telescoping Sum". MathWorld. Wolfram.
  5. ^ Ablowitz, Mark J.; Fokas, Athanassios S. (2003). Complex Variables: Introduction and Applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-521-53429-1.
  6. ^ Apostol, Tom (1967) [1961]. Calculus, Volume 1 (Second ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 388.
  7. ^ a b "Telescoping Series - Product". Brilliant Math & Science Wiki. Brilliant.org. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  8. ^ Bogomolny, Alexander. "Telescoping Sums, Series and Products". Cut the Knot. Retrieved 9 February 2020.