Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Rieff
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 19:42, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Currently tagged with {{cleanup-importance}}, this person's only claim to fame was that he was the first husband of Susan Sontag. Zzyzx11 | Talk 05:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete spouses that aren't notable in their own right--nixie 07:34, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not inherently notable. Megan1967 08:30, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete — Redundant with content on Susan Sontag's page. Also delete links to Philip on the Susan Sontag and David Rieff pages. — RJH 18:39, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly notable in his own right, although it wasn't clear from the previous state of the article. The Encyclopaedia Britannica mentions two of his books in the "additional reading" section of the article on Sigmund Freud. / Uppland 08:58, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, per Uppland's findings. Kappa 22:05, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- keep' this please Yuckfoo 06:41, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep the added material makes it appropriate content. Tobycat 05:59, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.