User talk:Rupertslander

Proposed deletion of Final out of the 2021 National League Division Series

The article Final out of the 2021 National League Division Series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable from the 2021 National League Division Series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Final out of the 2021 National League Division Series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Final out of the 2021 National League Division Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final out of the 2021 National League Division Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Muboshgu (talk) 18:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of space travellers by first flight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orbital velocity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Over–under

Hi, Rupertslander. I noticed you added a large portion of unreferenced text to the article over–under. Would you be able to add reliable sources to substantiate it? Thank you. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 22:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1985 Ontario general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitutional convention.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1971 AFC Championship Game

Hello, Rupertslander. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1971 AFC Championship Game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1971 NFC Championship Game

Hello, Rupertslander. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1971 NFC Championship Game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1971 AFC Championship Game

Hello, Rupertslander. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1971 AFC Championship Game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1971 NFC Championship Game

Hello, Rupertslander. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1971 NFC Championship Game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the London Bridge Task Force

Hello! You seem to have an interest in the recent death of Elizabeth II, so I wanted to invite to the WikiProject of Current Events new task force The London Bridge Task Force, which will be working on improving all the articles around the death of Elizabeth II. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, which is where you can communicate with other editors who all have the same goal, which is improving all the articles around a specific topic. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 23:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whiskey Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1979 NHL expansion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Hunter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saskatchewan Marshals Service moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saskatchewan Marshals Service, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saskatchewan Marshals Service for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saskatchewan Marshals Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatchewan Marshals Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Lenin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cover story.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Nebraska movement

Unfortunately, your edit to the lead section oversimplifies things in a way which might contradict the text of the article below. Many who opposed the Kansas-Nebraska act were not immediately willing to renounce their previous political affiliation. Abraham Lincoln was still a Whig in mid-1855 (and worried about the rise of the Know-Nothings), as revealed in his famous "Russia" letter to Joshua Speed. The main effect of the Kansas-Nebraska act turmoil turned out to be to catalyze the founding of the Republican Party which then attained major-party status, but that was a lot more obvious in the hindsight of the late 1856 election results than it was to people in 1854 and 1855... AnonMoos (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 06:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have flagrantly ignored warnings about unsourced content at your IP's talk page, User talk:198.166.8.76, so I've blocked your user account as well. Graham87 06:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also pinging Deadman137. Graham87 06:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who died and made you Führer? Rupertslander (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is, at best, an extreme overreaction. Rupertslander (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saskatchewan Marshals Service

Hello, Rupertslander. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saskatchewan Marshals Service, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saskatchewan Marshals Service

Hello, Rupertslander. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saskatchewan Marshals Service".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pro-Line Racing

The article Pro-Line Racing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't believe this page meets notability guidelines. Most of the websites that mention it online are selling the product, and don't mention anything beyond that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Malice at the Palace

Malice at the Palace has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sir MemeGod  12:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]