Talk:Barong tagalog

Fashion High‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines B‑class High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

I wondered whether the Spanish imposition of the Barong Tagalog on the Filipinos was folklore or not. A further condition regarding the Barong was, in the same untraceable source in which I originally read the contents of the article, that it should have no pockets. Not having pockets meant, to the colonial Spanish, that the Pinoys could not steal the silver.

An ironical twist to the tale is that all visitors to Malacañang (The presidential palace) are now required to wear the barong. Folklore? I've never been invited to the palace. But I wonder if George W. Bush has a barong in his closet. Shirt tails out (to show deference), thin material (he could thus not hide a WMD) and no pockets in which to hide GMA's silver?

An interesting thought! How much of this is truth and how much folklore?

Sean (Cape Town, ZA)

Source: An untraceable email. Hoping there is someone out there who can coroborate/refute.

There is a competing theory which disputes the official story about the barong. The alternate theory is that the barong is the Philippine adaptation of the guayabera, a shirt which is popular in Latin American communities. Harvzsf 06:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems the some of the Spanish themselves believe the "official" theory. Soluziona, a Spanish company, reportedly prohibits its Filipino employees in the Philippines from wearing the Barong in the office, because of its colonial implications. --seav 14:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BARONG IS UNIQUELY A FILIPINO DRESS.

Barong Tagalog is like the Filipino culture, a fusion of Asian and Western culture. Bold text

baros and indios?

It says in the fourth paragraph:

"Connoisseurs of historical details say that during the Spanish era, the rulers required that the baro of the indio be made of flimsy material so that he could not conceal weapons on his person."

What's a baro and an indio? Neither of the things that they linked to make sense so I'm removing the links, but if someone does know what they are and/or how the old links were relevant, I hope they'll fix it and maybe update the baro and indio pages to better explain. 75.22.207.224 (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baro is the Tagalog word for Blouse in girls (like the BARO't Saya which is the Philippine National dress for Women) and shirt for men (BAROng Tagalog which is literally Tagalog Shirt in English).

Indio, on the other hand, in English translation, is Indian. In colonial times, all the natives are caled Indio. The term Filipino is used for Spaniards who were born in the Philippines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.85.21.251 (talk) 07:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Aussie Racial Superiority Insult.

The Aussie racists are very quick to judge any cultural aspect on it's face, a dress is a dress but the Aussie Imperialists see the world for their own bigoted mind, Hitler is very happy because the Aussie racists are gaining strength from not keeping their intellectual mouths shut.DON'T Judge in ORDER not to be judged, and please remove the controversy section it ignites the open minded Filipinos here, thanks a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.68.114 (talk) 10:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page is chock full of advertising for "barongwarehouse.com"

Page is chock full of advertising for "barongwarehouse.com" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.56.76.6 (talk) 17:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I've removed it. Scottjduffy (talk) 19:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barong Tagalog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023704/http://www.philippines.hvu.nl/clothes2.htm to http://www.philippines.hvu.nl/clothes2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]