Talk:World Revolution (UK)

From VfD:

A little entry on some communist newspaper. World Revolution as a concept merits its own article probably at world revolution, but I'm not sure on this. Dunc_Harris|☺ 15:45, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: I vote to delete web-link-holding mentions for the folks I agree with (socialists) and people I don't agree with. Not notable, stub, linkspam. Geogre 16:37, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep & Clean Up: I trust Jmabel's hand in this, but I don't think the article yet really establishes notability for it. Also, the entanglements of the press with the International are hard for me to fathom without knowing how strong the bodies were and are. Let's see if more can be done by the Cleaning crew. My primary objection, above, is that this was a linkholder. It isn't anymore. Geogre 00:33, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Quadell (talk) 20:25, Aug 5, 2004 (UTC)
• Don't delete - lins removed and information added
  • Vote by anon User:129.31.40.145, (presumably the author) who should log in to have his vote counted. He has expanded the page to, so its maybe worth a second look. Dunc_Harris|☺ 14:20, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Obscure, but less so than plenty that we keep. I'm in general for keeping articles that explain where the various little left (and right) factions fit into the history of plits and merges. This is info someone could reasonably be trying to look up, and this sort of thing is sometimes hard to come by. I find this more appropriate use of Wikipedia than a lot of the pop culture and sci-fi trivia we accumulate. -- Jmabel 03:34, Aug 7, 2004 (UTC)

end moved dicussion

World Revolution

Just wondering if this organisation is still active as there is another group calling themselves World Revolution which has links to Workers Power (anon 14 March 2005)

Yes ICC/World Revolution is still active. It has no connection with the Workers Power youth group which is called Revolution. Jock Haston (15 July 2005)