Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well defined outcome
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 17:49, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
A list of questions to ask oneself to achieve a well-defined (or well-formed?) outcome. Not encyclopedic; I don't believe the topic is either, at least not without starting over. — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 00:28, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless fixed. It's basically a how-to. Linked from Neurolinguistic programming, but statistics, game theory etc also have a concept of well defined outcomes. Kappa 00:55, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very descriptive; if it had a source, it'd make more sense, somewhat. But as it is, it looks like it was extracted straight from a self-improvement book. --Sn0wflake 03:43, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, but it needs a complete re-write. Well-formed outcome is a concept that could have a valid entry. A quick google search for "well-formed outcome" found this and this. Surely there's enough info here to make a decent article. --DaveTheRed 03:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Like my teacher says, "this is ugly". Delete. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:45, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- The well defined outcome of this will be deletion. -R. fiend 04:06, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- A "how-to" guide, and I am being generous. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 15:05, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Of no value. Giano 15:37, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Since as it was mentioned it is part of Neurolinguistic programming, and it is very important concept in that one, I would suggest to put it there or redirect to other NLP pages.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.